DNC Files Civil Suit Against Trump, Russia Over Election Hacking
The suit, drawing on the volume of reporting over the issue, seeks to subject Trump campaign officials, as well as Russia, to the civil discovery process.
April 20, 2018 at 01:27 PM
5 minute read
Alleging a massive international conspiracy, the Democratic National Committee filed suit in Manhattan federal court Friday against members of the campaign of President Donald Trump, WikiLeaks, and the Russian government for the hacks of the DNC's computers by Russian agents in support of Trump's bid for the presidency.
The 66-page complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York pulls together a master narrative of the various strands made public since the DNC's computers were hacked in 2015 and 2016 ahead of the presidential election.
From the allegations of Russia executing the breaches of the DNC, to the communications between Trump adviser Roger Stone and WikiLeaks—both named defendants—to the meeting between then-campaign manager Paul Manafort, Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, and Donald Trump Jr.—all also named defendants—and a Russian attorney who promised “dirt” on Hillary Clinton, the complaint brings together all of the relevant episodes in the Trump-Russia saga to claim a broad conspiracy that did “profound damage” to the DNC, as well as the nation.
“The conspiracy constituted an act of previously unimaginable treachery: the campaign of the presidential nominee of a major party in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the presidency,” the complaint stated. “And, in carrying out this effort, defendants conspired to disseminate documents stolen from the DNC in violation of the law … Under the laws of this nation, Russia and its co-conspirators must answer for these actions.”
The suit does allege specific harm done to the DNC. The committee claims it suffered a “dramatic drop” in donations. It had to pay more than $1 million to repair and fix its cybersecurity issues. Staff members suffered harassment, including death threats. But the suit also aims to “address the individual and collective conduct” of the named defendants.
The complaint begins with what it says are pre-existing ties between Russian figures and various associates of Trump, as well as the president himself. Relying on media reports, the complaint detailed Trump business connections with Russia, Manafort and his associate's work in Ukraine, before turning to the history of Russian President Vladimir Putin's long-standing interest in harming former Democratic presidential candidate Clinton's campaign.
The complaint maintains throughout that the actors worked together in an effort to do damage to Clinton and the Democratic Party ahead of and during the 2016 presidential election in support of the Trump campaign.
In many ways, the suit represents a civil parallel to the criminal work being pursued by special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into the same material. According to a source with insight into DNC's suit, the civil suit operates entirely separate from Mueller's work, even as substantial amounts of material used in support of the civil proceeding is based on the efforts of the U.S. Department of Justice's investigation into the matter.
What the civil suit provides, according to the source, is the opportunity to bring the civil discovery process to bear on many of the allegations made against the Trump campaign team. A number of named defendants, such as Manafort, are already the subject of criminal charges brought by Mueller. Others, such as former campaign aide George Papadopoulos and Manafort associate Rick Gates are cooperating with the government.
According to the source, the civil proceedings aren't counting on any of the criminal discovery material, and are expecting to proceed from scratch in an attempt to prove the allegations in the complaint. The civil action will aim to remain disentangled from the work being done by Mueller, the source said.
However, the source said the DNC's own internal investigation, along with public documents such as intelligence reports establishing Russia as being behind the hack, and indictments and other court filings that support the allegations are enough to validate the complaint.
There were no immediate responses to requests to press officers or the individual named defendants in the matter for comment.
“During the 2016 presidential campaign, Russia launched an all-out assault on our democracy, and it found a willing and active partner in Donald Trump's campaign. This constituted an act of unprecedented treachery: the campaign of a nominee for president of the United States in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the presidency,” said DNC chairman Tom Perez.
“No one is above the law and the perpetrators of this attack must be held accountable,” he said, adding that he expects future election attacks and the suit is aimed in part at preventing them.
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll represent the DNC in the matter.
Read the law suit below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
3 minute readUS Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
In Resolved Lawsuit, Jim Walden Alleged 'Retaliatory' Silencing by X of His Personal Social Media Account
'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250