Judicial Conduct Commission Says Suspended Rochester City Judge Should Be Removed From Bench
New York's judicial ethics watchdog has recommended the removal of an embattled Rochester City Court judge who has faced a barrage of legal woes during her three years on the bench, including her most recent arrest for allegedly attempting to make an illegal firearms purchase.
April 24, 2018 at 12:13 PM
4 minute read
Rochester City Judge Leticia Astacio.
New York's judicial ethics watchdog has recommended the removal of an embattled Rochester City Court judge who has faced a barrage of legal woes during her three years on the bench, including her most recent arrest for allegedly attempting to make an illegal firearms purchase.
Citing a 2016 conviction for driving while intoxicated, subsequent violations of her conditional sentence, her apparent lack of remorse and her conduct on the bench, the Commission on Judicial Conduct announced on Tuesday that Rochester City Judge Leticia Astacio should be taken off the bench.
Astacio, who was elected to a 10-year term in 2014, was convicted of DWI in August 2016; in the arrest for the DWI, a trooper encountered her in a badly damaged automobile on the side of the road, and the judge reacted to the trooper in a “profane and angry” manner, according to a news release from the commission.
After the conviction, Astacio twice violated the terms of her conditional sentence, the commission said. In November 2016, she pleaded guilty to attempting to start her car after testing positive for alcohol in her system on her ignition interlock device.
In May 2017, she failed to submit a court-ordered alcohol test and failed to appear in court because she had left the country for a long trip to Thailand.
The commission also said that Astacio engaged in misconduct on the bench for failing to recuse herself from the arraignment of a former client and making “discourteous, insensitive and undignified” comments in court, including telling a sheriff's deputy to use physical force to contain an unruly defendant and laughing during a sexual abuse case when a defense attorney said the victim in the case had “buyer's remorse.”
“Faith in the courts requires all judges to respect and comply with the law, to preside fairly and without even the appearance of bias, and to obey court orders when they themselves are litigants,” said Robert Tembeckjian, the conduct commission's administrator and counsel, in a news release. “Regrettably, Judge Astacio failed to uphold each of these principles. Her behavior has undermined trust in the administration of justice, which we hope in some measure to restore with this decision to remove her from office.”
Astacio can appeal the commission's finding to the state Court of Appeals, which on April 11 suspended Astacio with pay.
Astacio's lawyer, Robert Julian of the Law Offices of Robert F. Julian, said that he and his client are reviewing the commission's determination to decide their next steps, but declined to comment further.
“Our case is with the Court of Appeals, not the court of public opinion,” Julian said.
In a statement issued on Thursday, state Supreme Court Justice Craig Doran, the administrative judge for the Seventh Judicial Circuit, which includes Rochester, said that, for the last two years, “one matter has overwhelmingly dominated the public's attention” — apparently referring to Astacio — while hundreds of judges in his jurisdiction have gone about “quietly and diligently upholding the law.”
“This has been an unfortunate distraction from the critically important work done, on a regular basis, by the highly competent and caring judges and court staff serving the people of this community,” Doran said.
Tembeckjian discussed the commission's findings in Astacio's case in a news conference and also used the appearance to address public concern about the length of time that the judge has been allowed to stay in office and the limitations placed on his office to adjudicate and publicly discuss disciplinary matters.
Specifically, he said the commission is hindered in its work by dealing with a rising tide of complaints against judges with an ever-dwindling staff: When the commission was launched in 1978, he said, it had more than 60 staff members dealing with about 700 complaints each year.
Now, Tembeckjian said, there are fewer than 40 staffers handling more than 2,000 complaints each year.
“All New Yorkers should be concerned when their ethics entities are underfunded,” Tembeckjian said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Support Magistrates: Statutorily Significant
- 2Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 3Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 4Monday Newspaper
- 5How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250