Graduates of NY Law Schools Do Well on Bar Exam as Other Candidates Falter
Seventy percent of the graduates of New York law schools who took the bar examination for the first time in February passed, the state Board of Law Examiners announced today.
April 25, 2018 at 12:00 PM
3 minute read
Seventy percent of the graduates of New York law schools who took the bar examination for the first time in February passed, the state Board of Law Examiners announced today.
The passing rate for the 357 graduates was an increase of 1 percentage point.
While the graduates of New York's 15 law schools performed better than their counterparts in 2017, the passing rate for all test takers dipped 6 percentage points. Repeat test takers had a dismal passing rate of 25 percent and foreign-educated candidates did only slightly better with 28 percent passing.
Of the 3,759 candidates who took the test in February, 1,421, or 38 percent, passed compared with 44 percent in February 2017. There were 403 fewer test takers than last February, the lowest number since 2009.
The candidates included domestic- and foreign-educated candidates, first-time takers and repeaters.
The passing rate for the 882 graduates of all American Bar Association-accredited law schools who took the New York State bar examination for the first time in February was 69 percent, a decrease of 2 percentage points from February 2017.
Of the 2,349 repeaters, only 594 passed for a passing rate of 25 percent, which is lower than the repeaters passing rate of 34 percent in February 2017.
There were 1,632 foreign-educated candidates who sat for the test in February, accounting for 43 percent of all candidates. Their passing rate was 28 percent, a decrease of 6 percentage points from last year.
Along with the numbers, the board released a list of all successful candidates.
Nationally, scores on the February test were the lowest in more than a decade, while scores for those taking the exam during the more popular July session have been on the upswing.
February's bar examination marked the fourth year of the Pro Bono Scholars Program. It permits students to sit for the bar exam in their final year of law school in return for devoting their last semester to performing pro bono service for the poor through a clinic or externship.
There were 119 participants in this year's program, the largest group since its inception, and 106 of them passed the February examination for a passing rate of 89 percent.
Those who passed the bar are certified for admission to the Appellate Division and must appear before the Committee on Character before being admitted to the bar.
A candidate is not certified for admission until the board receives proof that the candidate has successfully completed the New York Law Course and has passed both the New York Law Exam, an online, open book test of 50 multiple choice questions testing New York law, and the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination administered by the National Conference of Bar Examiners.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250