Graduates of NY Law Schools Do Well on Bar Exam as Other Candidates Falter
Seventy percent of the graduates of New York law schools who took the bar examination for the first time in February passed, the state Board of Law Examiners announced today.
April 25, 2018 at 12:00 PM
3 minute read
Seventy percent of the graduates of New York law schools who took the bar examination for the first time in February passed, the state Board of Law Examiners announced today.
The passing rate for the 357 graduates was an increase of 1 percentage point.
While the graduates of New York's 15 law schools performed better than their counterparts in 2017, the passing rate for all test takers dipped 6 percentage points. Repeat test takers had a dismal passing rate of 25 percent and foreign-educated candidates did only slightly better with 28 percent passing.
Of the 3,759 candidates who took the test in February, 1,421, or 38 percent, passed compared with 44 percent in February 2017. There were 403 fewer test takers than last February, the lowest number since 2009.
The candidates included domestic- and foreign-educated candidates, first-time takers and repeaters.
The passing rate for the 882 graduates of all American Bar Association-accredited law schools who took the New York State bar examination for the first time in February was 69 percent, a decrease of 2 percentage points from February 2017.
Of the 2,349 repeaters, only 594 passed for a passing rate of 25 percent, which is lower than the repeaters passing rate of 34 percent in February 2017.
There were 1,632 foreign-educated candidates who sat for the test in February, accounting for 43 percent of all candidates. Their passing rate was 28 percent, a decrease of 6 percentage points from last year.
Along with the numbers, the board released a list of all successful candidates.
Nationally, scores on the February test were the lowest in more than a decade, while scores for those taking the exam during the more popular July session have been on the upswing.
February's bar examination marked the fourth year of the Pro Bono Scholars Program. It permits students to sit for the bar exam in their final year of law school in return for devoting their last semester to performing pro bono service for the poor through a clinic or externship.
There were 119 participants in this year's program, the largest group since its inception, and 106 of them passed the February examination for a passing rate of 89 percent.
Those who passed the bar are certified for admission to the Appellate Division and must appear before the Committee on Character before being admitted to the bar.
A candidate is not certified for admission until the board receives proof that the candidate has successfully completed the New York Law Course and has passed both the New York Law Exam, an online, open book test of 50 multiple choice questions testing New York law, and the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination administered by the National Conference of Bar Examiners.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute read'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250