Many §1983 plaintiffs seek to establish municipal liability for the violation of constitutional rights based on the enforcement of a municipal custom or practice. This column analyzes “custom or practice” municipal liability. We will explain the importance of this issue, explore the meaning of “custom and practice,” and identify the types of evidence that may be admissible to prove a municipal custom or practice.

In its landmark decision in Monell v. N.Y.C. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), the U.S. Supreme Court held that municipalities may be sued under §1983, but not on the basis of respondeat superior. A municipality may be liable under §1983 only for its own wrongs, which means when the violation of the plaintiff’s federal rights resulted from the enforcement of a municipal policy or practice. “[I]t is when execution of a government’s policy or custom …  inflicts the injury that the government as an entity is responsible under §1983.” Id. at 694.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]