It's Time to Listen to George Washington
George Washington had no use for political parties, and he feared foreign interference in our domestic affairs
May 01, 2018 at 10:59 AM
4 minute read
Mount Vernon was chosen as the site for the first dinner tendered by the Trump administration to a foreign leader. That was a wonderful way to honor America's first president. A greater tribute this week would have been to remember the words and advice of our founding father.
George Washington had no use for political parties, and he feared foreign interference in our domestic affairs. He made this clear in his valedictory Farewell Address to his “friends and fellow citizens.”
Last month, when the House Intelligence Committee terminated its investigation of Russia's interference with our elections, Trey Gowdy (R-SC), a member of that committee, said this: “It is crystal clear Russia's ultimate goal was to turn Americans against Americans, undercut our confidence in the electoral process, and sow the seeds of discord. On that measure, we are in direct control—as Americans—of whether they succeed or not.”
Apparently the Russians are succeeding. We now have Republican leaders in Congress, including House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes (R-CA), forwarding a criminal referral to the Justice Department, seeking an investigation of several former and present FBI and Department of Justice officials, as well as Hillary Clinton.
This is just what our first president feared when he warned against those “tools and dupes” who would assist foreign nations in subverting our American interests. At the same time, he said, we should bestow “applause and praise” on the “real patriots” who will not “surrender” American principles of liberty. In a contemporary context, it is the Russian interference with our election that should be deplored—not the intelligence and FBI agencies laboring to keep us safe from the “tools and dupes” who would undermine our democracy for their own purposes.
Of course, suspected violations of the law should be subject to investigation by the proper agencies. But there is little doubt that these “criminal referrals” are designed to diminish the public's trust in responsible law enforcement agencies and to discredit whatever they have accomplished in an effort to protect us from foreign intrusion in the electoral process. As our first president put it: “History and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government.”
Among those subject to criminal referral is Hillary Clinton. Which brings us to another of George Washington's warnings: He distrusted political parties, because he felt they could use partisanship as “potent engines…to subvert the power of the people.” He feared that political parties might encourage the populace “to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual” who would use this power “to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.”
If parties empowered such an individual, our first president feared the rise of a “spirit of revenge,” an effort by the victorious party to punish those who had lost the election. Washington could not predict the call for Hillary Clinton to be imprisoned or for the renewed passion to revisit matters investigated and disposed of long ago in order to punish the “loser.” But he rightly noted and warned us that this kind of behavior was done in “different ages and countries” and led to “a more formal and permanent despotism.”
As in years past, the Senate honored George Washington's birthday with a reading of his Farewell Address in the United States Senate Chamber. This year the task fell on Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE). Unfortunately, no other senators were in the chamber to listen. On that same day, at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), the mention of Hillary Clinton's name brought shouts of “Lock Her Up.” Apparently, those in that room were also deaf to President Washington's admonition. It's time we all listened.
Sol Wachtler, a former chief judge of the New York State Court of Appeals, is a distinguished adjunct professor at Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Biblical Reconciliation Between Judaism and Islam: A Lesson for Everyone, Everywhere
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 2'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 3Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 4A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 5Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250