Mintz Levin Adds Practice Leader, White-Collar Pro From Haynes and Boone
David Siegal, best known for obtaining a high-profile defense victory for private equity financier Benjamin Wey, co-led the government enforcement and litigation practice at Haynes and Boone.
May 01, 2018 at 01:04 PM
2 minute read
David Siegal, who has co-chaired Haynes and Boone's government enforcement and litigation practice for several years, has joined Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo as a New York member.
Siegal is best known for obtaining a high-profile defense victory for private equity financier Benjamin Wey in a securities fraud and money laundering case. The Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission voluntarily dismissed their cases against Wey, after a judge suppressed evidence based on deficient warrants.
Siegal, who joined Mintz Levin on Monday, previously served for nine years as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, including as a member of the office's Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force. He joined Dallas-based Haynes and Boone in 2009 after leaving the government.
In more than 25 years of practice, Siegal has tried 20 federal criminal and civil cases, almost all to juries that returned verdicts, Mintz Levin said. He represents individuals and companies in government enforcement investigations and actions, including those in financial services, manufacturing, sports management and pharmaceutical industries. He currently represents broker Roman Sledziejowski in a securities fraud case scheduled for a June trial in Texas.
Siegal, 50, said he anticipates his clients to join him at the Boston-founded firm.
“My client relationships are the type where the client and his lawyers develop a personal, strong bond in high-stakes, often high-stress situations,” he said.
Siegal said he was “attracted to the size and quality” of Mintz Levin's East Coast white-collar defense practice. At his prior firm, he said he was the only white-collar defense-focused practitioner in New York.
Mintz Levin's strong financial year was another factor in his decision to move, he said. The firm saw a third consecutive year of record financial growth last year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
4 minute readDistressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
Trending Stories
- 1Graffiti Showdown: Miami Clashes Over Demolition Site Cleanup Before New Year’s
- 2Phila. Jury Awards $15M to Woman Who Slipped on Apartment Building Stairs
- 3Appellate Division Greenlights State Bar's Leadership Diversity Initiatives
- 4SEC’s Latest Enforcement Actions Fuel Demand for Big Law
- 5Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250