Nassau County Courthouse Story Evokes Warm Memories
As a young lawyer then, I regret not paying close enough attention to the classic architectural details of my work space and the whole surrounding environs of that magnificent venue
May 01, 2018 at 12:27 PM
3 minute read
I was delighted to read the article about the laudable effort to gain landmark status for the historic and classical Nassau County Courthouse on Old Country Road in Mineola. The story evoked warm memories for me because I began my public service career there in 1963 as law secretary to Second Department Appellate Division Associate Justice Marcus G. Christ. I remained with him in that role until 1970, by which time he was presiding justice. The local residential chambers suite for Justice Christ (and my lovely adjacent office) were located at the southwest corner on the first floor of that county courthouse. The primary chambers were at 45 Monroe Place in Brooklyn.
As a young lawyer then, I regret not paying close enough attention to the classic architectural details of my work space and the whole surrounding environs of that magnificent venue. I also recall naively wondering why my Judge – the most senior jurist in the county – did not occupy the more spacious chambers suite located nearby. Supreme Court Trial Justice Mario Pittoni presided there and one day told me the story of how he came to have those chambers. My unassuming judge had deferred to him, though he was junior, because the senior judge simply thought that the trial justice needed the extra space for daily conferencing routines in working with the lawyers on trials.
Judge Christ was a very practical man and a very classy man, too, with no pretensions about rank.The judicial process, its efficient operation and the institution were paramount to him and Judge Pittoni's story proved it. My judge's own more modest Mineola residential chambers, as an appellate justice primarily operating out of Brooklyn, were needed only for two or three days a week, so he made that quiet sacrifice. As a young lawyer in my first job in the court system, I learned many valuable lessons from my Judge's example in that regard and in so many other ways, too.
Concerning the landmark effort, I can vividly recall my pride upon entering the courthouse that I was privileged to work in as his law secretary. After a few years, the then-new Supreme Court building in Mineola was completed across the street and we moved in again on the southwest corner – a fine chambers in a modernist courthouse that will never attain landmark status. My Judge was still the most senior jurist – even, soon to be designated as presiding justice of the huge 2nd Department – yet, he once again deferred occupancy to the local administrative judge for the most spacious chambers.
It was good to have the New York Law Journal revive such nostalgic memories through publication of the important efforts of those trying to keep the historic courthouse more alive through landmark status as a recognition of all that it has stood for though the decades in service to the public good. I hope it succeeds, and after working with one of the finest judges and human beings ever to occupy that privileged space, I am sure that my culturally refined judge would enthusiastically add his enthusiastic vote for the designation of “his” original prestigious residential judicial work space as a landmark courthouse.
Joseph W. Bellacosa retired from his position as associate judge on the state Court of Appeals in 2000. He also served as dean of St. John's Law School.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Regressive Institution': SDNY Judge Rakoff Delivers Pointed Remarks on SCOTUS in Recent Appearance
2 minute readFederal Court That Faces Its Share of Real-Life Horrors Gets Into Halloween Spirit
1 minute readLegal Aid Society Honors Milbank Attorney, Selendy Gay for Providing Pro Bono Firepower
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250