NY Appeals Court Rejects de Blasio's Bid to Shield Emails From Disclosure
Emails between Mayor Bill de Blasio's office and an outside consultant not employed by the city are not exempt from New York's open records law, a state appeals court ruled on Tuesday, affirming a ruling last year by a lower court and granting attorneys fees to the plaintiffs.
May 01, 2018 at 03:53 PM
4 minute read
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio. NYLJ Photo/Rick Kopstein.
Emails between Mayor Bill de Blasio's office and an outside consultant not employed by the city are not exempt from New York's open records law, a state appeals court ruled on Tuesday, affirming a ruling last year by a lower court and granting attorneys fees to the plaintiffs.
In fighting requests brought under the state Freedom of Information Law by NY1 and the New York Post for emails between the mayor's office and Jonathan Rosen and members of BerlinRosen, Rosen's public relations firm, the mayor's office employed the novel argument that the consultants were “agents of the city.”
But a panel of the Appellate Division, First Department said that Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Joan Lobis correctly found in her ruling last year that de Blasio “lacked a rational basis” for withholding communications between his office and BerlinRosen.
BerlinRosen had been retained by the Campaign for One New York (CONY), a 501(c)(4) established after de Blasio was elected to his first term in 2013 to help further his administration's policy goals. CONY accepted donations from entities with business before City Hall, according to reporting in Politico.
Writing for a unanimous First Department panel, Justice Anil Singh said that, for communications between a government agency and an outside consultant to be considered exempt from FOIL, the consultant must be employed by the agency.
“This attempt expands the agency exemption and closes the door on government transparency,” Singh said.
Singh also noted that, in November 2016, more than 18 months after a NY1 reporter filed a FOIL request, the de Blasio administration released 1,500 pages of emails between the office and BerlinRosen.
Singh was joined on the decision by Justices David Friedman, John Sweeny, Ellen Gesmer and Cynthia Kern.
NY1 was represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld attorneys Douglass Maynard, Estela Diaz and Jessica Oliff Daly; the Post was represented by Davis Wright Tremaine attorneys Elizabeth McNamara and Jeremy Chase.
A spokesperson for Charter Communications, which owns NY1, said the company was pleased with the appellate court's ruling and that it “look[s] forward to receiving the requested documents.”
Assistant Corporation Counsels Richard Dearing, Devin Slack and John Moore appeared for the city. A Law Department spokesman said it is reviewing the decision.
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the Manhattan District Attorney's Office both launched investigations into the nonprofit, but ultimately declined to bring any charges.
De Blasio shut down CONY in 2016, saying that it had accomplished its goals, namely promoting the implementation of universal prekindergarten and affordable housing legislation.
But CONY's dealings are still under scrutiny by state watch dogs, according to a release by the state's Joint Commission on Public Ethics (JCOPE).
Last month, the JCOPE reached a $40,000 settlement with James Capalino, a lobbyist who was solicited for donations by CONY's chief fundraiser.
Capalino donated a combined $100,000 on behalf of himself and lobbying clients, and he and the clients were subsequently able to have a breakfast meeting with the mayor.
Additionally, a group promoting legislation to ban horse-drawn carriages in the city agreed to pay a $10,000 to the JCOPE, also for making donations to CONY at the request of the organization's fundraiser, and for lobbying without filing required reports.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250