NY Appeals Court Rejects de Blasio's Bid to Shield Emails From Disclosure
Emails between Mayor Bill de Blasio's office and an outside consultant not employed by the city are not exempt from New York's open records law, a state appeals court ruled on Tuesday, affirming a ruling last year by a lower court and granting attorneys fees to the plaintiffs.
May 01, 2018 at 03:53 PM
4 minute read
Emails between Mayor Bill de Blasio's office and an outside consultant not employed by the city are not exempt from New York's open records law, a state appeals court ruled on Tuesday, affirming a ruling last year by a lower court and granting attorneys fees to the plaintiffs.
In fighting requests brought under the state Freedom of Information Law by NY1 and the New York Post for emails between the mayor's office and Jonathan Rosen and members of BerlinRosen, Rosen's public relations firm, the mayor's office employed the novel argument that the consultants were “agents of the city.”
But a panel of the Appellate Division, First Department said that Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Joan Lobis correctly found in her ruling last year that de Blasio “lacked a rational basis” for withholding communications between his office and BerlinRosen.
BerlinRosen had been retained by the Campaign for One New York (CONY), a 501(c)(4) established after de Blasio was elected to his first term in 2013 to help further his administration's policy goals. CONY accepted donations from entities with business before City Hall, according to reporting in Politico.
Writing for a unanimous First Department panel, Justice Anil Singh said that, for communications between a government agency and an outside consultant to be considered exempt from FOIL, the consultant must be employed by the agency.
“This attempt expands the agency exemption and closes the door on government transparency,” Singh said.
Singh also noted that, in November 2016, more than 18 months after a NY1 reporter filed a FOIL request, the de Blasio administration released 1,500 pages of emails between the office and BerlinRosen.
Singh was joined on the decision by Justices David Friedman, John Sweeny, Ellen Gesmer and Cynthia Kern.
NY1 was represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld attorneys Douglass Maynard, Estela Diaz and Jessica Oliff Daly; the Post was represented by Davis Wright Tremaine attorneys Elizabeth McNamara and Jeremy Chase.
A spokesperson for Charter Communications, which owns NY1, said the company was pleased with the appellate court's ruling and that it “look[s] forward to receiving the requested documents.”
Assistant Corporation Counsels Richard Dearing, Devin Slack and John Moore appeared for the city. A Law Department spokesman said it is reviewing the decision.
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the Manhattan District Attorney's Office both launched investigations into the nonprofit, but ultimately declined to bring any charges.
De Blasio shut down CONY in 2016, saying that it had accomplished its goals, namely promoting the implementation of universal prekindergarten and affordable housing legislation.
But CONY's dealings are still under scrutiny by state watch dogs, according to a release by the state's Joint Commission on Public Ethics (JCOPE).
Last month, the JCOPE reached a $40,000 settlement with James Capalino, a lobbyist who was solicited for donations by CONY's chief fundraiser.
Capalino donated a combined $100,000 on behalf of himself and lobbying clients, and he and the clients were subsequently able to have a breakfast meeting with the mayor.
Additionally, a group promoting legislation to ban horse-drawn carriages in the city agreed to pay a $10,000 to the JCOPE, also for making donations to CONY at the request of the organization's fundraiser, and for lobbying without filing required reports.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOrrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Ephemeral Messaging Going Into 2025:The Messages May Vanish But Not The Preservation Obligations
5 minute readSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 2Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 3Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 4Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 5Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250