Judge Enters $24M Award Against Commercial Tenant Over 'Frivolous' Delays in Lease Dispute
A Manhattan state court judge has awarded $24 million to a landlord in a lease dispute with a commercial tenant who switched lawyers four times over 16 months of litigation and upbraided the tenant for apparently trying to delay the case with numerous bankruptcy filings.
May 02, 2018 at 04:44 PM
5 minute read
Photo Credit: Bigstock
A Manhattan state court judge has awarded $24 million to a landlord in a lease dispute with a commercial tenant who switched lawyers four times over 16 months of litigation and upbraided the tenant for apparently trying to delay the case with numerous bankruptcy filings.
The commercial tenant entered into a lease in October 2015 for ground floor and basement space at 387 Park Ave. S. in Manhattan, in which the tenant agreed to build and run a French restaurant called Artisanal Fromagerie & Bistro, according to court papers.
Artisanal's principals are Stephanie Schulman and Sarid Drory, who both signed the lease, court papers state.
But by December 2016, the bistro still had yet to be built out, and the landlord hit the tenant with a notice to cure, alleging that the tenant owed more than $145,000 in back rent.
The tenant subsequently filed suit, and Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich of the Commercial Division motion for a “Yellowstone injunction,” a stay of a cure period named for a landmark 1968 decision by the Court of Appeals that prevents commercial landlords from terminating a lease while a dispute over an alleged lease default plays out in court.
But from that point, Kornreich said in a ruling published on Monday to dismiss the tenant's suit, the case was held up several times by “frivolous” delays that included bankruptcy filings in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York—the first filed in March 2017—and a changing cast of characters appearing in court on behalf of the tenant.
The cavalcade of law firms representing the tenant in the case began with Greenberg Traurig, which filed the motion for the Yellowstone injunction, but moved to be relieved the following month.
After Greenberg Traurig, the tenant hired David Rozenholc & Associates, next up was Adam Leitman Bailey, followed by Rosenberg & Estis.
Rosenberg & Estis was by the tenant's side for a hearing on a second request for a Yellowstone injunction, but Kornreich shot down the request, citing the fact that the tenant had breached the terms of the first injunction, and calling out the tenant for employing “gamesmanship” in the proceedings.
“Your client has continually played the system,” Kornreich said to Rosenberg & Estis member Bradley Silverbush during oral arguments, according to a transcript of the proceedings.
After failing to convince Kornreich that the denial of the second injunction request should be reargued, Artisanal filed for bankruptcy in the Southern District for a second time, in August 2017.
But Bankruptcy Judge James Garrity Jr. issued a sharply worded ruling dismissing the case in which he said the tenant is a “repeat bankruptcy filer” that filed the two bankruptcies as part of “its litigation strategy.”
In November 2017, the tenant appeared with its fifth law firm, Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein. With new counsel on board, Kornreich said, Kevin Nash of Goldberg Weprin “brazenly” removed the case to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to get back before Garrity, which again took the case out of Kornreich's jurisdiction.
“There is no doubt in this court's mind that this maneuver was another delay tactic that had no reasonable likelihood of success since Judge Garrity had already decided that tenant was to litigate the matter before this court,” Kornreich said in her dismissal order.
In a footnote to her ruling, Kornreich said she considered sanctions for Goldberg Weprin for its “frivolous conduct that was apparently designed solely to delay this case,” but said the admonishment should suffice.
In an interview, Nash defended his attempt to move the case back to bankruptcy court, saying he believed there was still value in the lease, which, according to court papers, was the tenant's sole asset.
“I don't think it's a fair assessment because it was a proper removal,” Nash said.
Kornreich awarded $23.3 million to the landlord to satisfy the balance of the lease term, which is through Nov. 30, 2031, and more than $759,700 in unpaid rent that had accrued since February 2017.
Kornreich also awarded attorney fees for the landlord for both the lease dispute and the bankruptcy proceedings, struck the tenant's complaints and pleadings and said that if she were to decide the case on the merits, the landlord would win.
Newman Ferrara attorneys Ricardo Vera, Noe Solorzano and Shirley Yang represented the landlord throughout the case. Lucas Ferrara, a name partner at the firm, said the case was a “long, drawn-out battle” and that the attorneys are pleased with the result, but declined to comment further on the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 2Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 3Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 4Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
- 5Manufacturer Must Provide Details Surrounding Expert’s Livestreamed Inspection, Fed Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250