4 Convicted in Political Intelligence Insider Trading Scheme
Prosecutors alleged a political intelligence consultant passed along information illegally purloined from Medicare administrators to hedge fund partners who used it to make millions.
May 04, 2018 at 02:09 PM
2 minute read
Four defendants accused of insider trading on nonpublic Medicare information were found guilty by a jury late Thursday after a four-week trial, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York announced.
The defendants were charged, among other things, with conspiracy to convert government property to commit securities fraud, and wire and securities fraud conspiracy.
The primary scheme revolved around the passing of confidential information from an employee at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Christopher Worrall, to a former CMS employee turned political intelligence consultant, David Blaszczak, to two partners and analysts at a health care-focused hedge fund named Deerfield Management Co. The two partners, Theodore Huber and Robert Olan, were said to have received tips about three pending CMS decisions about Medicare reimbursement rates.
Huber and Olan then used the information to recommend trades that prosecutors said netted Deerfield more than $7 million in profits. Deerfield settled a related suit brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for $4.6 million in August.
Another former Deerfield partner, Jordan Fogel, previously pleaded guilty in the scheme and cooperated with the government during the case.
Blaszczak also faced charges in a separate scheme involving other information obtained from CMS regarding reimbursement rates for home health providers. He was alleged to have provided that information to a different hedge fund, resulting in $330,000 in profits from trades tied to the material. The trader in that instance also pleaded guilty early on and was cooperating with the government.
The case represented a somewhat novel approach to insider trading prosecution, focused on the issue of political intelligence rather than the more often seen business intelligence underlying allegations of this kind of fraud.
“Trading on confidential nonpublic government information is just as illegal as trading on corporate insider information,” Deputy U.S. Attorney Robert Khuzami said in a statement. “Our office is committed to policing and prosecuting both.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourts Beginning to Set Standards for Evidence Relying Upon Artificial Intelligence
4 minute readNY Judge Admonished Over Contributions to Progressive Political Causes
Attorneys ‘On the ‘Move: Morrison Cohen Expands White Collar Practice; O’Melveny Brings Back Corporate Finance Partner
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 2'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 3Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
- 4On the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
- 5State Budget Proposal Includes More Money for Courts—for Now
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250