Jay-Z's Attorney Says SEC Pursuit of Open-Ended Testimony a 'Celebrity Hunt'
Last week, the SEC filed suit against the world-famous rapper in the Southern District of New York, requesting the court compel him to testify in an investigation over the company he sold his Rocawear clothing line to in 2007.
May 07, 2018 at 12:48 PM
3 minute read
Jay-Z may be a business, man, as his lyrics say, but his attorney, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner Alex Spiro, says the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has no business requesting an open-ended interview process with the rapper with no concrete limit on the artist and entrepreneur's time.
Regulators' attempts now to compel Jay-Z through a court order raise “serious questions about whether this exercise has transcended any investigative purpose and crossed over into a celebrity hunt,” Spiro stated in a filing Monday.
According to Spiro, he spent the weekend working on a solution to appease regulators by providing his client, whose given name is Shawn Carter, for questioning for a single day. In his filing Monday, Spiro said the SEC's pursuit of Carter simply made no sense, amounting to an onerous and unnecessary overreach.
At issue is the SEC's investigation into clothing brand management company Iconix's purchase of Carter's Rocawear clothing brand back in 2007 for $204 million. At the time, Iconix said Jay-Z would remain involved with the brand, namely through a number of joint ventures, according to the SEC.
In 2016, Iconix said in a financial statement that it suffered a reduction in assets and income to its Rocawear-related assets of $169 million in 2015. In the following year's filing, the company announced another $34.6 million in losses related to the Rocawear brand. The SEC says it launched an investigation in 2015 into Iconix over potential securities violations, including fraud, related to Iconix's reporting on its intangible assets, which includes Rocawear.
According to regulators, they have twice attempted to subpoena Carter—”an important witness”—as part of the investigation. They say they want to discuss the value of Rocawear and his involvement with the brand after its sale, the joint ventures he was involved in with Iconix, transactions between Carter and Iconix, and what he may have known at certain times about what was going on at Iconix based on calls, emails and meetings he may have been at. Both times, they say, he refused to appear.
In his filing Monday, Spiro said that the SEC has, in fact, subpoenaed not only Carter but numerous business affiliates of his. On Feb. 6, 2017, regulators issued seven separate document subpoenas to Carter, his Roc Nation COO Desiree Perez, and five of his businesses. Spiro noted that the SEC has been provided with almost 11,000 pages of responsive material, and that Perez herself sat for a seven-hour day of testimony before the commission.
Carter, according to Spiro, is willing to sit for an interview with regulators, but the issue is one of timing. Whereas Carter will sit for a single day, the SEC, Spiro said, “insists” Carter “commit to continuing to testify for multiple days to the extent that the SEC wants to keep questioning him.” Having rejected Carter's attempts to provide the SEC with what it needs, including other members of Carter's business team with experience dealing with Iconix, the “single issue” of open-ended testimony has become “a deal breaker,” forcing Carter to oppose the motion, Spiro said.
An SEC press officer declined to comment on the state of negotiations between the parties.
Carter currently remains ordered to appear before U.S. District Judge Paul Gardephe on Tuesday to show cause why he should not be compelled to testify.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Zuckerman Spaeder Gets Ready to Move Offices in DC, Deploy AI Tools in 2025
- 2Pardoning Jan. 6 Defendants May Send Bad Message About Insurrection, Rule of Law
- 3Looming Clash Over Abortion Pills Shows Overturning 'Roe v. Wade' Settled Nothing
- 43rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
- 5Latest Class of Court Officers Sworn into Service in New York
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250