Iranian Hostage's Daughter Says Iran Deal Discussions Should Include Fate of Prisoners
We have been told repeatedly that Iran is a country of laws, and the Iranian judiciary is scrupulous in its adherence to those laws. We know firsthand this is a lie.
May 09, 2018 at 02:30 PM
4 minute read
President Trump has made the decision to withdraw from the JCPOA and has left the door open to discussions about a new agreement with Iran. The pros and cons of this decision will continue to be debated in the days to come. But unbelievably, in all the public commentary to date about what's at stake with any new Iran deal, there has been essentially no mention of the Americans who are being imprisoned by the Iranian regime.
My father, Robert Levinson, is the longest held hostage in US history. He was taken while visiting Kish Island, Iran, in March 2007. Since then he has had no contact with the outside world, and he and my family—my mother, my six brother and sisters and I—have been living a nightmare no one should ever experience. For the past 11 years, we have been unable to get any acceptable response from the Iranians as to what happened to my father, and we feel that our efforts to get him home are at a complete stalemate. We are desperate for justice and mercy, and day after day, the Iranians and their Supreme Leader fail to provide it.
We have been told repeatedly that Iran is a country of laws, and the Iranian judiciary is scrupulous in its adherence to those laws. We know firsthand this is a lie.
In a recent interview, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif stated that the Iranian judiciary “is an independent organ, just what you would say about your courts, and we cannot have an impact on the decision of our judiciary.” However, according to a meeting we had just a few weeks ago with our lawyer from Iran, Mr. Mohamad Hossein Aghasi, there is absolutely no indication of sufficient will and determination by this “independent organ” in following up on my father's case, which was opened through proper judicial channels after my father was taken.
Practically nothing has moved on the case since it was filed, and there is no record that the investigation into what happened to him, which should have been directed and overseen by the court, has ever taken place. The Iranian courts have ignored a motion filed by Mr. Aghasi to compel a witness—David Belfield (aka Dawud Saluhuddin), the last known person to see my father in Iran—to testify. Mr. Aghasi has followed up on this motion repeatedly, but still the Judiciary has not acted on his legal request. And although Mr. Aghasi filed the case as “criminal kidnapping,” it was subsequently reclassified with no notice to our attorney as a “security” case (the equivalent of a local missing persons case being moved to Homeland Security with no explanation) and no visible action has been taken since it was moved.
Why? What is it about this case that is preventing a judicial system with a reputation for legal rigor from following its own procedures? Who is interfering with the Iranian court's own established protocols to block the case of my father, Robert Levinson, from being resolved? What will finally compel action?
Iranian government officials recently stepped up their claims that my father left Iran: “Levinson traveled to Iran in a certain period, then he left Iran,” and “Iran has no information on him after he left the country.” Yet they provide no supporting details such as when he left, where he went, and what “evidence” they have that this even happened. My father's passport has never appeared in any other country. The Iranians have never produced a final report despite years of claiming they have completed their investigation. Mr. Aghasi tells us the case is still open in the Iranian courts so how can they claim he left but have no further information? Even the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention rendered an opinion and expressed concern at the government's lack of response to the allegations brought against them. All we want is information that can help us find our father and bring him home.
In its handling of the case of Robert Levinson, it is clear the Iranian judicial system has been failing to live up to its own standards for years now, and my family and my father continue to suffer. The silence of the Supreme Leader is deafening.
If Iran wants to be taken seriously as a global power in the international community, they have the opportunity right now to show goodwill by acting immediately to send my father home.
We need justice and mercy. We need our father home.
Sarah Moriarty is the daughter of Iranian hostage Robert Levinson.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepealing Fault Grounds for Divorce Would Have Little Effect on NY Matrimonial Law
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
- 2‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
- 3Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 4Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
- 5DOT Nominee Duffy Pledges Safety, Faster Infrastructure Spending in Confirmation Hearing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250