Vance Blasts Cuomo for Pulling Him Off Schneiderman Investigation
The Manhattan DA said the governor violated the separation of powers, utilizing a logical fallacy to justify pulling him off the Schneiderman investigation over what the DA said was a nonexistent conflicted of interest.
May 09, 2018 at 07:21 AM
6 minute read
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. in a sternly worded letter to Gov. Andrew Cuomo, accused the state's chief executive of violating the separation of powers Tuesday, when he pulled Vance's authority to investigative allegations of assault and intimidation leveled against former attorney general Eric Schneiderman in favor of Nassau District Attorney Madeline Singas, who the governor appointed as a special prosecutor earlier in the evening,
In a letter to both newly sworn-in acting Attorney General Barbara Underwood and DA Singas, Cuomo announced Singas' appointment as the special prosecutor he promised on Monday after the publication of a New Yorker article detailed allegations of nonconsensual violence against a number of former Schneiderman ex-girlfriends. Schneiderman announced his resignation within hours of the story's publication.
Singas was charged by the governor with investigating allegations that Schneiderman slapped, choked, intimidated and violently threatened a number of ex-girlfriends, as well as the suggestion in the article that AG office staff and resources may have been used to facilitate the allegations detailed in the piece.
While noting that Singas would work with Suffolk County DA Tim Sini, who has jurisdiction over the Hamptons location where some of the allegations were said to have occurred, as well as any other DAs that may have various jurisdictional purview, Cuomo said the Manhattan DA's office would no longer be involved.
Vance's shop had, “at minimum, an appearance of conflict,” Cuomo said, because the Manhattan DA's office was currently being investigated by the attorney general for its handling of allegations of sexual assault against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.
“There can be no suggestion of any possibility of the reality or appearance of any conflict or anything less than a full, complete and unbiased investigation,” Cuomo stated. “The victims deserve nothing less.”
In his Tuesday night letter to Cuomo, Vance said he agreed with the governor's position on the needs of the victims, but argued that any conflict of interest “was one of [Cuomo's] creation.” It was, after all, the governor who ordered then-AG Schneiderman to investigate any improper handling of sexual assault allegations against Weinstein in 2015, Vance said.
The details of a failed police sting against Weinstein and the suggestion by some that Vance's office failed to properly handle the case were the subject of a previous New Yorker article that led to numerous Hollywood actresses coming forward to allege sexual harassment and assault at Weinstein's hands. Vance has defended his office's handling repeatedly, most recently in a scathing article in New York Magazine that suggested rich defendants receive preferential over poor ones by Manhattan prosecutors.
In his letter, Vance said Cuomo's decision in March to have Schneiderman investigate the Manhattan office's actions represented “an unwarranted intrusion by an elected executive into a charging decision by an independent prosecutor.”
Raising the specter of untoward political motivation, Vance noted that, the day Cuomo directed the AG's office to investigate was the same day Cynthia Nixon announced her campaign, which, Vance said, was seen by some as “politically motivated.”
“I have no idea whether or not that is true,” he continued. “But more important, and beyond politics, it violated the separation of powers that is intended to promote confidence in the independence of our criminal justice system.”
Vance argued that the governor “intrud[ing] further into the criminal process” by giving Singas power over any Schneiderman investigation in Manhattan “only compounds the mistake” of Cuomo's decision to have the AG investigate the DA's office in the first place.
For Vance, the fact that there is zero overlap between the Weinstein investigation and any investigation into Schneiderman's actions—“they involve entirely separate claims of assault, involving entirely separate parties”—and that the fact one of the supposedly conflicted parties, Schneiderman, is no longer in a position to be conflicted, there is simply no conflict.
In a revealing note, Vance stated that Cuomo had essentially acknowledged the dissipation of any potential conflict on Monday.
“I pointed this out to you on the telephone last night, and you agreed at that time that Mr. Schneiderman's resignation would obviate any conflict for our office,” Vance stated in the letter.
In the end, Vance argued, independent prosecutors, “answerable to local constituents,” should be left in charge of local charging and jurisdictional issues.
“Interference with law enforcement investigations by an elected chief executive should always be viewed with great care, especially these days, given the propensity of our elected executive at the federal level in Washington to make statements and take actions that jeopardize the independence of our criminal justice system,” the Manhattan DA stated.
In a statement sent late Tuesday, Alfonso Davis, counsel to the governor, called Vance's letter “editorial commentary” that was “both inappropriate and misguided given the ongoing investigations.”
“Confronted with the reality of a conflict, we took action to ensure both the integrity of the investigation and the public's confidence in the process,” Davis said. “In doing so, we put in place an elected official and independent prosecutor who could preside over the investigation without the specter of conflict or compromise.”
In a followup letter sent Wednesday to correct, as Davis put it, “blatant misstatements of facts” by Vance, the governor's counsel argued that the Manhattan prosecutor was wrong to suggest the investigation only concerned “private citizen” Eric Schneiderman.
Davis referred back to the language in Cuomo's letter that called on the special prosecutor to also look into whether staff or office resources were used to further the alleged misconduct by Schneiderman. As the AG's office is still investigating Vance over the Weinstein case, Davis said it was “frankly absurd” to think the Manhattan DA's office could investigate that same office the way the special counsel would.
Davis went on to make clear that the governor's office was still asking the attorney general's office to investigate the relationship between the Manhattan DA and the city's police department in the handling of sex crimes. Davis said Acting AG Underwood had been contacted “to ensure the process begins ASAP.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
- 2New York Top Court Says Clickwrap Assent Binds Plaintiff's Personal-Injury Claim to Arbitration in Uber Case
- 3'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
- 4About the Awards: Southeastern Legal Awards Q&A with Regional Managing Editor Michael Marciano
- 5Private Credit Boom: Miami’s Role as a Financial and Litigation Hub
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250