NY Regulator Fines Insurers, Broker Over NRA-Branded Gun Owner Liability Policies
Fines and consent orders against a broker and insurers followed a DFS probe, which found that the NRA “Carry Guard” program provided liability insurance to gun owners and resident family members for legal costs connected with criminal defense in violation of state law. Meanwhile, the NRA is suing the broker in federal court for discontinuing the program.
May 10, 2018 at 02:13 PM
6 minute read
Photo: sundrawalex / iStockphoto.com
The New York Department of Financial Services has fined an insurance broker, Lockton Affinity, $7 million in connection with sales of a National Rifle Association-branded “Carry Guard” insurance program and similar products for gun owners, and also separately fined a subsidiary of Chubb Group Holdings $1.3 million for underwriting the same type of insurance, as part of consent orders with the companies.
Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vullo said in a statement earlier this week the actions followed a DFS probe, which found that the NRA “Carry Guard” program sold by the Chubb subsidiary Illinois Union and broker Lockton Affinity provided liability insurance to gun owners and resident family members for legal costs connected with criminal defense for using a legally owned firearm, violating state law. Lockton Affinity is licensed as an excess lines insurer in New York. The NRA is not licensed to operate as a business in New York state, DFS said.
Vullo said, “DFS will not tolerate conduct by any entity, licensed or otherwise, in contravention of New York Insurance Law, especially when that conduct is such an egregious violation of public policy designed to protect all citizens,” in an announcement.
An attorney for the NRA, William Brewer III, signaled a looming battle over gun liability policies on Wednesday, saying in an emailed statement, “The NRA will take appropriate steps to make sure law-abiding gun owners in New York and across the country have access to the insurance coverage they need.” The organization has filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Virginia against Lockton Affinity over its discontinuance of the NRA-branded insurance program.
The “Carry Guard” insurance policies brokered by Lockton and issued by Chubb and Illinois Union Insurance Co. provided coverage for policyholders and their family members for bail, attorney fees and retainer expenses and defense of criminal charges among other costs connected with being criminally prosecuted for using a legally owned weapon.
DFS asserts the policies violate state law because they offered defense coverage in a criminal proceeding and liability coverage for bodily injury or property damage intended by the policyholder beyond the use of reasonable force; as well as coverage for psychological counseling support, which is not permitted in excess lines coverage in the state. (Civil litigation coverage is permitted, a DFS spokesman said.) As part of the order, the insurance companies agreed to notify policyholders within 10 business days that they are canceling all Carry Guard policies within 90 days from the date of notice, and returning the premiums.
Dean Davison, senior vice president for communications at Lockton Affinity, said in an emailed statement Wednesday, “When we learned of New York regulatory issues in our Affinity business in the course of an investigation by the New York DFS, we immediately went to work to begin resolving them. As part of our settlement, we will continue to cooperate with the New York regulators to remediate any issues or concerns.”
Following the Parkland, Florida, mass school school shooting, Lockton notified the NRA in February that it would no longer broker NRA co-branded insurance programs. On May 4, the NRA filed a federal civil lawsuit (1:18 cv-542-AJT/TCB) against Lockton in the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria division, alleging the brokerage breached its contract with the organization by discontinuing the programs. A Lockton spokesman said it was not appropriate to comment on pending litigation.
NRA counsel Brewer, partner at Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors in New York, said in an emailed statement Wednesday of the lawsuit: “The NRA believes that Lockton violated its fiduciary obligations—to the detriment of the organization, insurance program it was entrusted to run, and the policyholders who obtained protections by those insurance products.” He said Lockton had provided expertise and various insurance products with the NRA for more than 20 years. “For reasons that are unclear to us—and were never communicated to the NRA in accordance with Lockton's contractual obligations—the company is beating a retreat from its prior advice that these products complied with applicable state regulations in all respects.”
Meanwhile, Reuters reported on Wednesday that Lloyd's of London also announced that it would tell its syndicates to stop writing or offering all insurance made available or endorsed by the NRA. The company said it also is under inquiry by New York's DFS. Chubb provided notice in October 2017 that it was voluntarily terminating its participation nationally in the Carry Guard program, a spokesman said.
Lockton Affinity and the NRA wrote or offered at least 11 other firearms-related insurance programs to NRA members in New York state from January 2000 to March 2018, issuing more than 28,000 policies and collecting more than $12 million in premiums during that period, according to the consent order. Chubb, Illinois Union and Lockton said they had sold 680 Carry Guard policies between April and November 2017 to New York residents but had received no claims. The NRA also received royalties from the program.
Chubb and Illinois Union agreed under their consent order to stop selling “Carry Guard” policies in New York state or to its residents. The companies also agreed not to enter into any other agreements for NRA co-branded insurance in New York. Additionally, Lockton Affinity agreed in its consent order not to distribute policies from other insurers for residents that provide the banned coverages.
Chubb said in an emailed statement Wednesday about the DFS order that “Chubb at all times intended and believed its coverage to be in full compliance with New York law. Chubb believes that this settlement is the best way to resolve the coverage questions raised by the department and is fully committed to cooperating with the department to remediate any issues or concerns regarding the Carry Guard program.”
Kevin Rampe, Chubb Group general counsel, and John Mulhern of Drinker Biddle & Reath represented Chubb and Illinois Union in the consent order, which was signed by Joseph Wayland, executive vice president and general counsel of Chubb Group Holdings.
Scott Edelman of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy and Andrew Holland of Sidley Austin represented Lockton Companies LLC and Lockton Affinity in the consent order, which was signed by William Humphrey, secretary of Lockton Affinity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.