Trove of Documents Expected to Reveal NYPD's Asset Seizure Practices
The department handed over 160,000 documents related to a year's worth of seizures in the Bronx as part of a settlement agreement with The Bronx Defenders and Davis Wright Tremaine.
May 14, 2018 at 09:33 AM
4 minute read
The New York City Police Department will hand over 160,000 documents that chronicle the department's practice of seizing cash, cars and phones from Bronx residents between June 2016 and July 2017, public defenders in the Bronx announced Monday.
The hand-over is part of a settlement of litigation brought by The Bronx Defenders and Davis Wright Tremaine that challenged the department's refusal to provide substantial details about the department's property seizure and civil forfeiture policies through freedom of information requests.
The information, according to Bronx public defenders, will allow the first meaningful glimpse into the department's practices and their impact.
“Until today, the impact of the NYPD's seizure of property and cash has only been seen and felt by the low-income people of color it routinely affects, like our clients in the Bronx,” Adam Shoop, legal director at The Bronx Defenders, said in a statement. “This settlement will change that.”
The public defender organization filed a Freedom of Information Law request in 2014 in an attempt, the group says, to gather basic information around the millions of dollars of property that the NYPD seizes during arrests. The FOIL asked for details on how much is being seized, how much is kept as revenue, and how much is being returned to people arrested by the department.
After receiving what they describe as only a handful of documents, The Bronx Defenders sued in August 2016 to compel the department to respond to the information request.
What was public about the NYPD's seizure policies shows the department taking in, and keeping on hand, millions of dollars taken from arrestees. The Defenders noted that, historically, a single line in the department's budget, “Unclaimed Cash & Property Sale,” accounted for the department's handling of seized material.
In 2016, its most recent budget, the department identified $7.1 million it had taken in, but provided no additional details. While 2017 was not accounted for, 2018 was estimated to see the figure grow to $8.25 million.
Material provided in response to the Defenders' FOIL request last year showed the department's seizure policy has resulted in an even larger overall balance. According to the records provided, over the course of 2016 the balance of just seized currency by the NYPD ranged between $68 million and $72 million. By April 2017, the department reported that number had increased to more than $74 million.
According to the Defenders, throughout the litigation, the department has acknowledged it performs no accounting on its property seizure or forfeiture practices. A $25 million system the public defenders say is responsible for tracking property seizures lacks the ability to create reports.
The Bronx public defender organization said the 160,000 documents it's now received from the department will hopefully provide a detailed accounting of the department's practices, which the organization has promised to make public once its analysis is finished.
In a statement, a spokesman for the city's Law Department said the current system the NYPD has in place is used for the “efficient management” of seized material, “not for reporting out on various informational requests, especially since the system contains personal information of members of the public.”
“There has been no allegation that any of the assets were mishandled,” the spokesman's statement continued. “In an effort to be more transparent, the NYPD was able to provide information to satisfy the Bronx Defender's FOIL request and end the litigation while at the same time protecting the personal information in the database.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOrrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Ephemeral Messaging Going Into 2025:The Messages May Vanish But Not The Preservation Obligations
5 minute readSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250