Brothers Arrested for Running Fraudulent PACs
U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman of the Southern District of New York said his office believed the case represents the first of its kind, calling it "a long overdue evaluation by law enforcement."
May 17, 2018 at 06:43 PM
3 minute read
Two brothers were arrested Thursday on charges they fraudulently presented more than a half-dozen political action committees they controlled as advancing a host of causes, from supporting law enforcement to pro-choice advocacy, when in reality virtually none of the $23 million they raised since 2014 went towards political contributions, federal prosecutors claim.
William Tierney and Robert Tierney founded and directly operated six PACs, and oversaw the handling of at least three others, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Over the past decade, the PACs raised more than $50 million from tens of thousands of donors. But for every dollar raised, U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman of the Southern District of New York said less than a cent actually went towards political efforts. The defendants, however, allegedly walked away with more than $3.5 million.
“As alleged, the defendants secretly operated numerous political action committees, raising small-dollar donations from people who believed their hard-earned money would support the causes described in solicitation calls and mailings,” Berman said in a statement. “In reality, as alleged, these PACs were political action committees in name only—they engaged in no advocacy campaigns, education efforts, or political operations, and donated less than 1 percent of the money they raised to candidates for office, all while personally enriching the defendants.”
Berman said the case is, as far as his office knows, the first prosecution of its kind to target “scam PACs,” calling them a growing problem “hiding in the tall grass of our political system.” He noted that in the 2016 election cycle, some 8,000 PACs received over $4 billion in funds, representing half of all the election spending.
“Media reporting suggests that this is not an isolated incident,” Berman said during a separate conference call with reporters. “Clearly the potential for abuse … is significant, and potentially widespread.”
Prosecutors allege the Tierneys went to lengths to mask their activities. Shell companies were created as pass-through entities. Donated funds were transferred to the accounts of these companies, which prosecutors claim were given names to make them seem related to marketing, consulting and communications efforts.
Even the telemarketers who worked the phones for the PACs were told to create shell companies to try and prevent the Federal Election Commission, donors and other members of the public from being able to follow the money, federal authorities claim.
According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, William Tierney is represented by Wiley Rein of counsel Robert Walker and partner Ralph Caccia. His brother, Robert, is said to have retained London & Mead name attorney Christopher Mead and attorney D. Bradley Clements. Neither set of attorneys responded to a request for comment.
The defendants were expected to be presented Thursday afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
7 minute read'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250