NY Health Dept. Affirms Right to Medicaid Coverage for Gender Dysphoria Treatment
The state health department overturned on May 11 a decision by an administrative judge that had upheld Medicaid insurer Healthfirst's denial of coverage for a mammoplasty procedure for a 27-year-old transgender person, saying the operation was not medically necessary.
May 18, 2018 at 03:00 PM
2 minute read
Photo: shutterstock.com
The New York State Department of Health has affirmed the right of a gender-nonconforming transgender patient to Medicaid coverage for breast-reduction surgery in what advocates are calling a historic decision.
The state health department overturned on May 11 a decision by an administrative judge that had upheld Medicaid insurer Healthfirst's denial of coverage for a mammoplasty procedure for a 27-year-old transgender person, saying the operation was not medically necessary. The administrative law judge had ruled in June 2017 that the regulation guaranteeing nondiscriminatory coverage for Medicaid patients for gender reassignment surgery did not apply to nonbinary individuals, but only for those transitioning from male to female or female to male.
The administrative judge's decision was appealed with assistance from the Legal Aid Society, the Sylvia Rivera Law Project and the firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher, acting pro bono.
In a statement announcing the DOH decision, Heidi Bramson, staff attorney with the Legal Aid Society's health law unit, said, “The Legal Aid Society is hopeful that this historic, precedent-setting decision will inform insurance plans, health care providers, judges and gender non-conforming individuals that health care discrimination on the basis of gender identity is illegal and it has no place in New York.”
In a statement, Wesley Powell, partner at Willkie Farr, said, “We are pleased with the Department of Health's decision in this important case, which should further cement the rights obtained in Cruz v. Zucker—that transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming New Yorkers have access to medically necessary, gender affirming health care.”
In an interview Friday, Powell said, “I think the case is particularly important coming now when there has been more of a public conversation that the experience of gender is not binary. This is a critically important decision.”
The Legal Aid Society, Sylvia Rivera Law Project and Willkie Farr filed Cruz in 2014 challenging a state regulation that banned Medicaid coverage for sex reassignment-related procedures and treatments. The federal lawsuit decided by U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff in July 2016 in the Southern District of New York led to a repeal of the ban, and an amended regulation effective December 2016 that required Medicaid to cover medically necessary procedures for individuals with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readRulings From NYC's Administrative Law Court to Be Published in the Law Journal
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250