In the United States, sovereign immunity is set forth in the Eleventh Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. The Amendment precludes any suit against a sovereign entity unless it has specifically waived that immunity. In intellectual property, this limits the ability to sue a sovereignty entity for patent infringement or challenge the validity of a patent owned by a sovereign entity in courts and at the U.S. Patent Office.

When, in 2013, Congress overhauled the America Invents Act (AIA), the idea of Sovereign Immunity came back into play for patent holders. The reason for this was the AIA’s sweeping reforms to Patent Office’s administrative proceedings, allowing private parties to challenge the validity of already-issued patents at the PTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)—known as inter partes review (IPR). 35 U.S.C §314. Pharmaceutical companies, in an attempt to find creative and unique solutions to protect their patents, attempted to use Sovereign Immunity to shield the validity of their patents—the most notable is Allergan’s deal with the Mohawk Tribe.

Native American Tribal Sovereignty

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]