Manhattan Supreme Court Denies Petition to Throw Out Complaint Against Mount Vernon Mayor Thomas
New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron, in a decision issued on Friday, denied the Article 78 petition in "Thomas v. Underwood."
May 21, 2018 at 05:32 PM
3 minute read
Mount Vernon Mayor Richard Thomas. Photo: Facebook/City of Mount Vernon
A state Supreme Court justice in Manhattan denied a petition to throw out a felony complaint filed by former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman against Mount Vernon Mayor Richard Thomas, but agreed that the former AG overstepped his authority.
New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron, in a decision issued on Friday, denied the Article 78 petition in Thomas v. Underwood, Index No. 154456/2018, that had asked the court to declare the felony complaint filed by Schneiderman on March 11 was issued in violation of lawful procedure.
The complaint charged Thomas with grand larceny for allegedly stealing campaign and inauguration funds for personal use. The petition also had challenged the authority of the acting attorney general to pursue the case, and asked the court to issue a preliminary injunction against acting Attorney General Barbara Underwood ordering her to cease enforcement actions against Thomas.
Engoron's decision stated that “in the final analysis, if this Court were forced to decide whether or not the AG had the authority to investigate the matters at hand, it would decide that it did not.” Engoron wrote: “Finally, applying [People v.] Cuttita … the AG simply didn't have the power here claimed.”
But, Engoron wrote further, when the Westchester County grand jury indicted Thomas for fraud on May 16, “as a result of the indictment, what had been an attempt to prevent an investigation is now a collateral attack on a criminal case pending in another county.” He wrote that case law precludes Thomas from “seeking injunctive relief in this Court to quash an ongoing criminal prosecution or other proceeding elsewhere.” He denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Engoron said that Thomas would have to challenge the criminal proceeding in the Westchester County court, and secondarily challenge the authority of Underwood in the other court as well. But, he noted “in passing that whatever are the rules of succession for the NYS Attorney General, the idea that the office would not be able to function at all based simply on a vacancy is, to say the least, counter-intuitive.”
Randall W. Jackson, a partner at Boies Schiller Flexner, who represents Thomas, issued a statement Monday saying: “We appreciate the Court's careful consideration of the matter and its sound conclusion that the Attorney General has been engaged in an illegal investigation, in violation of New York's laws and Constitution. We look forward to addressing this issue and other serious problems with this case in the appropriate courts.”
Amy Spitalnick, spokeswoman for Underwood said, “We welcome the court's decision and look forward to proving our case in court.”
Thomas will be arraigned on the indictment on May 25 at 9:30 a.m. before Judge Barry Warhit in White Plains. The case will then be assigned to Judge Anne E. Minihan, according to the Attorney General's Office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
The American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
7 minute readGE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
2 minute readJudge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250