Manhattan Supreme Court Denies Petition to Throw Out Complaint Against Mount Vernon Mayor Thomas
New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron, in a decision issued on Friday, denied the Article 78 petition in "Thomas v. Underwood."
May 21, 2018 at 05:32 PM
3 minute read
Mount Vernon Mayor Richard Thomas. Photo: Facebook/City of Mount Vernon
A state Supreme Court justice in Manhattan denied a petition to throw out a felony complaint filed by former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman against Mount Vernon Mayor Richard Thomas, but agreed that the former AG overstepped his authority.
New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron, in a decision issued on Friday, denied the Article 78 petition in Thomas v. Underwood, Index No. 154456/2018, that had asked the court to declare the felony complaint filed by Schneiderman on March 11 was issued in violation of lawful procedure.
The complaint charged Thomas with grand larceny for allegedly stealing campaign and inauguration funds for personal use. The petition also had challenged the authority of the acting attorney general to pursue the case, and asked the court to issue a preliminary injunction against acting Attorney General Barbara Underwood ordering her to cease enforcement actions against Thomas.
Engoron's decision stated that “in the final analysis, if this Court were forced to decide whether or not the AG had the authority to investigate the matters at hand, it would decide that it did not.” Engoron wrote: “Finally, applying [People v.] Cuttita … the AG simply didn't have the power here claimed.”
But, Engoron wrote further, when the Westchester County grand jury indicted Thomas for fraud on May 16, “as a result of the indictment, what had been an attempt to prevent an investigation is now a collateral attack on a criminal case pending in another county.” He wrote that case law precludes Thomas from “seeking injunctive relief in this Court to quash an ongoing criminal prosecution or other proceeding elsewhere.” He denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Engoron said that Thomas would have to challenge the criminal proceeding in the Westchester County court, and secondarily challenge the authority of Underwood in the other court as well. But, he noted “in passing that whatever are the rules of succession for the NYS Attorney General, the idea that the office would not be able to function at all based simply on a vacancy is, to say the least, counter-intuitive.”
Randall W. Jackson, a partner at Boies Schiller Flexner, who represents Thomas, issued a statement Monday saying: “We appreciate the Court's careful consideration of the matter and its sound conclusion that the Attorney General has been engaged in an illegal investigation, in violation of New York's laws and Constitution. We look forward to addressing this issue and other serious problems with this case in the appropriate courts.”
Amy Spitalnick, spokeswoman for Underwood said, “We welcome the court's decision and look forward to proving our case in court.”
Thomas will be arraigned on the indictment on May 25 at 9:30 a.m. before Judge Barry Warhit in White Plains. The case will then be assigned to Judge Anne E. Minihan, according to the Attorney General's Office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readAttorneys Ordered to Apologize to South Philadelphia Residents Following 'Scream Test' Experiment
5 minute readDOJ: TD Bank Agrees to Pay $3B Over Anti-Money Laundering Program Violations
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250