Appeals Court Denies Kesha's Effort to Add Claims in Legal Battle With Producer
A Manhattan appeals court has dealt the pop singer a setback in her ongoing legal battle with Dr. Luke, finding a lower court properly denied her bid to amend her filings to allege breach-of-contract claims.
May 29, 2018 at 06:35 PM
2 minute read
A Manhattan appeals court has dealt pop singer Kesha a setback in her ongoing legal battle with her former producer, finding a lower court properly denied her bid to amend her filings to allege breach-of-contract claims.
In a unanimous ruling issued on Tuesday, a five-judge panel of the Appellate Division, First Department, said that Kesha's proposed counterclaims against Lukasz Gottwald, who is known as Dr. Luke, were “palpably insufficient” and that her bid to get out of contracts with Gottwald's production and publishing companies on the grounds that performance would be impractical because of the acrimonious relationship between the parties is undermined by the fact that she admitted that she continued performing under the contracts.
Justices David Friedman, Judith Gische, Peter Tom, Cynthia Kern and Anil Singh joined on the decision.
Gottwald is represented by O'Melveny & Myers attorneys Leah Godesky and James Pearl.
Kesha is represented by Christine Lepera of Mitchell Silberg & Knupp.
Gottwald filed a breach-of-contract suit against Kesha, whose full name is Kesha Rose Sebert, in 2014, alleging that she broke the terms of her recording agreement and that he was defamed by her accusations that Gottwald abused her.
Kesha fired back with counterclaims that Gottwald sexually assaulted her and that she was the victim of discrimination, but last year Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Shirley Werner Kornreich dismissed her claims.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDecision of the Day: Court Rules on Judgment Motions Over Police Killing of Pet Dog While Executing Warrant
A Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
13 minute readDecision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
Court of Appeals Provides Comfort to Land Use Litigants Through the Relation Back Doctrine
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Securities Action Targeting Polestar Alleges Mistakes in SEC Filings
- 2Conspiracy Suits Against Quinn Emanuel, Roc Nation Moved to Federal District Court
- 3'Knowledge of Mismatch:' Fed Judge Offers Guidance on How to Hold Banks Accountable for Erroneous Transfers
- 4PAGA Claims Must Now Be 'Headed'
- 5Million-Dollar Verdict: Broward Jury Sides With Small Business
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250