Harvey Weinstein Pleads Not Guilty to Rape Charges From Grand Jury
Harvey Weinstein pleaded not guilty Tuesday morning in state court in Manhattan to two counts of first- and third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act, kicking off another legal battle for the embattled movie mogul.
June 05, 2018 at 10:48 AM
3 minute read
Harvey Weinstein pleaded not guilty Tuesday morning in state court in Manhattan to two counts of first- and third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act, kicking off another legal battle for the embattled movie mogul.
A grand jury voted last week to indict Weinstein, who turned himself in to police on May 25 and was first arraigned on the same day. He did not testify before the grand jury because Weinstein's attorneys were “unfairly denied access” to information that they would need to defend him before the grand jury and there would be inadequate time to get Weinstein prepared.
The criminal sexual act count pertains to Lucia Evans, who says Weinstein allegedly forced her to perform oral sex during a period from June to September 2004, according to the indictment. Evans came forward and publicly confirmed that she was the victim of the alleged offense following Weinstein's arrest.
The rape charges pertain to a second, still-unnamed victim with whom Weinstein had forcible intercourse in 2013. Weinstein entered his plea before Acting Manhattan Supreme Court Justice James Burke.
Following the arraignment, Weinstein's attorney, Benjamin Brafman of Benjamin A. Brafman & Associates, told reporters that his client has maintained that he has never had “nonconsensual sex with anyone.”
“And as terrible a crime as rape is, it is equally reprehensible to be falsely accused of rape and since Mr. Weinstein has denied these allegations, that's where we are,” Brafman said. “In his view, he has been falsely accused of rape and I intend to help him win this case fair and square on the merits or the lack of merits.”
Brafman also said he would determine if there is a legal basis for trying the two sets of charges against his client separately. Weinstein is free on $1 million bail.
Assistant District Attorneys Joan Illuzzi and Kevin Wilson appeared at the arraignment for Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.'s office. The office declined to comment on the arraignment.
Following the grand jury vote, Vance said in a statement that Weinstein assaulted the “integrity of the survivors” and that his office will try the case “in the courtroom where it belongs” and not through the media.
Weinstein's arraignment comes days after three women filed a lawsuit under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act against Weinstein, production companies Miramax and The Weinstein Cos.; the Walt Disney Co. and other defendants alleging that they were subject to Weinstein's sexual predations and were kept quiet about them as part of a criminal enterprise between the defendants.
The RICO suit filed on June 1 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York is one of at least a dozen pending lawsuits against Weinstein pertaining to alleged sexual misconduct, according to papers filed in another suit filed by insurance giant Chubb regarding coverage for his legal defense.
In additional to the two RICO suits against Weinstein in the Southern District of New York, as well as a third RICO suit pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Weinstein faces suits in Los Angeles Superior Court, as well as courts in London and Canada.
There are also criminal investigations of Weinstein underway in London and California, according to court papers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Government Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
- 2Disney Legal Chief Sees Pay Surge 36%
- 3Legaltech Rundown: Consilio Launches Legal Privilege Review Tool, Luminance Opens North American Offices, and More
- 4Buchalter Hires Longtime Sheppard Mullin Real Estate Partner as Practice Chair
- 5A.I. Depositions: Court Reporters Are Watching Texas Case
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250