Harvey Weinstein Pleads Not Guilty to Rape Charges From Grand Jury
Harvey Weinstein pleaded not guilty Tuesday morning in state court in Manhattan to two counts of first- and third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act, kicking off another legal battle for the embattled movie mogul.
June 05, 2018 at 10:48 AM
3 minute read
Harvey Weinstein pleaded not guilty Tuesday morning in state court in Manhattan to two counts of first- and third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act, kicking off another legal battle for the embattled movie mogul.
A grand jury voted last week to indict Weinstein, who turned himself in to police on May 25 and was first arraigned on the same day. He did not testify before the grand jury because Weinstein's attorneys were “unfairly denied access” to information that they would need to defend him before the grand jury and there would be inadequate time to get Weinstein prepared.
The criminal sexual act count pertains to Lucia Evans, who says Weinstein allegedly forced her to perform oral sex during a period from June to September 2004, according to the indictment. Evans came forward and publicly confirmed that she was the victim of the alleged offense following Weinstein's arrest.
The rape charges pertain to a second, still-unnamed victim with whom Weinstein had forcible intercourse in 2013. Weinstein entered his plea before Acting Manhattan Supreme Court Justice James Burke.
Following the arraignment, Weinstein's attorney, Benjamin Brafman of Benjamin A. Brafman & Associates, told reporters that his client has maintained that he has never had “nonconsensual sex with anyone.”
“And as terrible a crime as rape is, it is equally reprehensible to be falsely accused of rape and since Mr. Weinstein has denied these allegations, that's where we are,” Brafman said. “In his view, he has been falsely accused of rape and I intend to help him win this case fair and square on the merits or the lack of merits.”
Brafman also said he would determine if there is a legal basis for trying the two sets of charges against his client separately. Weinstein is free on $1 million bail.
Assistant District Attorneys Joan Illuzzi and Kevin Wilson appeared at the arraignment for Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.'s office. The office declined to comment on the arraignment.
Following the grand jury vote, Vance said in a statement that Weinstein assaulted the “integrity of the survivors” and that his office will try the case “in the courtroom where it belongs” and not through the media.
Weinstein's arraignment comes days after three women filed a lawsuit under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act against Weinstein, production companies Miramax and The Weinstein Cos.; the Walt Disney Co. and other defendants alleging that they were subject to Weinstein's sexual predations and were kept quiet about them as part of a criminal enterprise between the defendants.
The RICO suit filed on June 1 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York is one of at least a dozen pending lawsuits against Weinstein pertaining to alleged sexual misconduct, according to papers filed in another suit filed by insurance giant Chubb regarding coverage for his legal defense.
In additional to the two RICO suits against Weinstein in the Southern District of New York, as well as a third RICO suit pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Weinstein faces suits in Los Angeles Superior Court, as well as courts in London and Canada.
There are also criminal investigations of Weinstein underway in London and California, according to court papers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 2Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 3Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 4Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 5Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250