Finding NY AG Lacks Jurisdiction, Judge Tosses Indictment of Upstate DA
The case was the first and only time that the Attorney General's Office has brought charges against a DA since Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued an executive order in 2015 giving the attorney general the authority to act as a special prosecutor in cases where police cause the death of an unarmed civilian.
June 12, 2018 at 04:38 PM
3 minute read
Rensselaer District Attorney Joel Abelove A judge dismissed the criminal indictment against Rensselaer County District Attorney Joel Abelove regarding his handling of an investigation of a police shooting, finding that the New York Attorney General's Office lacked jurisdiction to prosecute a perjury charge against him. Abelove had been charged with two counts of official misconduct and one count of perjury for allegedly withholding evidence from a grand jury that cleared a Troy, New York, police officer in the 2016 shooting death of Edson Thevenin during a traffic stop that resulted in a vehicle pursuit. The case was the first and only time that the Attorney General's Office has brought charges against a DA since Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued an executive order in 2015 giving the attorney general the authority to act as a special prosecutor in cases where police cause the death of an unarmed civilian. In a ruling issued Monday, Columbia County Court Judge Jonathan Nichols found that the attorney general did not have the statutory authority to prosecute the perjury charge and thus was not authorized to appear before the grand jury. The judge said the attorney general's unauthorized presence before the grand jury warranted dismissal of the full indictment, as the evidence presented for perjury and misconduct were “inextricably intertwined.” But Nichols noted that the office was still within its jurisdiction to appear before the grand jury on the misconduct charges, which he said were based on a “legally cognizable theory,” and which presented the unique situation in which it was “concurrently authorized and unauthorized” to present to the body. William Dreyer of Dreyer Boyajian represents Abelove. In a video posted by the Albany Times-Union following Nichols' ruling, Abelove told reporters that the prosecution was an attempted “political hit job” by former Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who left office in May amid allegations of physical abuse of women. “To know that this fiasco that the attorney general has initiated against me is now over is a tremendous relief,” Abelove said. Appearing for the Attorney General's Office in the case were Jennifer Sommers and Nicholas Viorst, deputy chiefs of the attorney general's Special Investigations & Prosecution Unit, which was created after Cuomo issued the executive order. Amy Spitalnick, a spokeswoman for the Attorney General's Office, said the office disagrees with Nichols' decision and is “determining how best to move this critical case forward.” “Our indictment detailed a disturbing pattern of misconduct that violated the law and undermined a criminal investigation,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250