Let's Tell It Like It Is: Sexual Abuse by a Cousin Is Incest
All abuse is traumatic and where one is in a trusting relationship it is even more devastating.
June 12, 2018 at 02:17 PM
7 minute read
Especially in the past few months, repugnant details have emerged concerning sexual improprieties by people at the highest levels of the political and entertainment worlds. We are no longer shy about public discussions involving pedophilia, clerical abuse or rape. Still, one area of sexual abuse remains secretive, private and unprosecuted – incest between family members other than a parent or a sibling. A number of studies regarding incest have been done. To our knowledge, none have specifically included cousins as perpetrators or victims. Whether on a camping trip, in their bed, under a blanket or being babysat, an assault by a family member – an assumed primal protector – is especially traumatic. Generally, sexual relations are illegal between any person related by lineal consanguinity, or a brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, or niece. In layperson's language “incest” means that sexual relations are forbidden between people classified as being too closely related to marry each other. Around the world, the specific relationships defined as incest vary from culture to culture; in the United States, each state has its own law. In some states, first cousins are allowed to marry each other (e.g. California, Colorado, New York, New Jersey, Florida ). In other states, marriage between first cousins is illegal (e.g. Oregon, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Montana, Nebraska ). There is a difference between an exploitative relationship versus teenage experimentation with each other between equal aged minors. When a teenager exploits and coerces a younger child in his family such as cousins engaging in any type of sexual behavior – even what they might call experimentation – that behavior is sexual abuse. The older cousin is abusing his protective role. Such abuse at the hands of someone who is considered family is devastating whether or not is it legally considered “incest.” The exploited and abused cousin's reaction is not a product of formal education or conditioning. Evolutionary signposts in our DNA signal us that incest is wrong and hurtful. All abuse is traumatic and where one is in a trusting relationship it is even more devastating. When one stranger abuses another we focus on the trauma of abuse. When a father abuses a daughter or son we call it abuse as well as incest. We give such abuse a unique name because incest is the ultimate taboo, even where it occurs between consenting adults. From a societal perspective, it is qualitatively different. When a family member commits exploitative abusive incest, it comes with a unique trauma because the harm is coming from someone who is a presumptive protector. Just because abuse is committed by a young family member, it should not be brushed off as mere childhood indiscretion. It is still abuse and causes trauma. |
Various Abuses Passed Off As 'Kissing Cousins'
Various abuses within a family where the discovery of a protector/victim is often passed off as “kissing cousins” or other non-criminal rationalization takes the blame off of the perpetrator and fails to recognize the full measure of the trauma to the young victim. Sadly, individuals who learn of this type of sexual abuse often do not want to report members of their own family to law enforcement or child protective authorities. It represents a failure in upbringing and parents may feel responsible. Particularly if the relationship is discovered across family lines neither family may want full disclosure. Because none of the principals involved, including parents, children, juvenile authorities, prosecutors and/or judges, have readily available options, this crime can leave a victim without an advocate, and without future protection, and portends a future of anguish and guilt for the young victim. While it is understandable that some adults may want to consider such ideas as child development, stages of sexual education of children, and the reality that at some point after puberty children show an interest in sex or sexual contact, there is no excuse for adults failing to acknowledge that young children simply cannot consent to a sexual relationship. All of this raises difficult questions. Who and when do we talk with children about sex? Children are taught not to talk to strangers and that no one has the right to inappropriately touch them. Importantly, children must understand that this lesson applies to everyone, including family members, including cousins. So many children are abused by a protector and don't report it because they care for or even love the abuser and they may feel guilt. As alluded to earlier, while there are states that allow cousins to marry, this does not address the problem of a purported protector taking advantage of a victim. Just because two teenagers are allowed to marry, this does not neutralize the fact that a child was sexually abused. Most attorneys do not face this kind of case. However, occasionally someone will come forward to seek redress. Assuming there is no criminal prosecution, an attorney may seek 1) to prove abuse in a civil court, and 2) seek damages in a civil suit, holding the parents responsible for the misdeed of their older teenage child. The issue of accountability of a parent may vary from state to state. There are difficult proofs involved as it would be fraught with all of the pitfalls of any civil litigation. Critically, the young child may have to testify and there will be need for expert testimony. Questions will need to be addressed such as video/technological evidence and medical evidence. There may a double-edged sword as the parents of the injured minor may themselves be considered negligent and may be subject to an action against them where a young child was exposed to injury by another family member. Note also that the medical witnesses are mandated reporters, another litigation hurdle. Abusive incest is not semantic. Sexual abuse has a nuanced language all its own and it's critical to changing behavior. Likewise, to name unspoken incest by younger persons is key to address how to deal with it. While some teenagers may engage in sex at some time, where do we draw the line between consensual sex and abuse of a protective relationship giving rise to an abuser and a victim? If it involves cousins, giving them the benefit of the doubt may really be giving them a license to abuse. Daniel Pollack is a professor in the School of Social Work at Yeshiva University. He has been an expert witness in more than 25 states. Case subject matter includes child abuse and neglect, and abuse and wrongful death of children in foster care, residential care and day care. Toby Kleinman a partner in the law firm of Adler & Kleinman. She has litigated domestic violence, child custody and abuse cases and has been a consultant in legal cases dealing with domestic violence and child abuse in over 45 states.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
7 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTikTok’s ‘Blackout Challenge’ Confronts the Limits of CDA Section 230 Immunity
6 minute readEnemy of the State: Foreign Sovereign Immunity and Criminal Prosecutions after ‘Halkbank’
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Top Five Florida Verdicts of 2024
- 2The Evolution of a Virtual Court System
- 3New Acquitted Conduct Guideline: An Analysis
- 4Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 52024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250