Bill to Create Prosecutorial Misconduct Commission Approved by NY State Assembly
The association representing New York state's district attorneys is urging members of the State Assembly to vote against a bill that would create a commission to investigate misconduct by prosecutors.
June 19, 2018 at 12:40 PM
2 minute read
The State Assembly gave final passage to a bill on Monday that would create a commission to investigate prosecutorial misconduct.
The commission would be authorized to investigate and review complaints against prosecutors specifically. The panel would have subpoena power and the ability to request documents and information in any case of misconduct. Its decisions would be made available to the public and compiled in an annual report to the legislature, governor and Court of Appeals.
The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York lobbied against the bill, calling it unnecessary and possibly unconstitutional.
“This is something that we need to do in this state and I stand here today on behalf of the wrongfully convicted,” Assemblyman Nick Perry said during the vote.
Some local DAs also took their shots at the proposal.
"This legislation is a mistake and quite likely unconstitutional,” Staten Island District Attorney Michael McMahon said in a statement. “It adds an unwieldy and unfunded layer of bureaucracy when defendants already enjoy an unparalleled right to appeal.”
Opponents of the measure have argued that a system already exists to discipline prosecutors in New York state. Each Appellate Division has a grievance committee that reviews complaints against attorneys in New York state and has the power to censure, suspend, or disbar them. Those committees are composed of both attorneys and nonattorneys and appointed by the court.
within 30 days provides Tuesday
The legislation does nothing to empower the state's grievance committees to improve their investigations of misconduct, McNamara said. The bill's supporters, including its sponsor in the State Senate, Sen. John DeFrancisco, R-Syracuse, have argued that the committees haven't done enough to investigate misconduct when presented with it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Unpaid Real Estate Taxes; License To Enter Adjoining Property: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 2Baker McKenzie Builds on AI Foundation, Crafting Tools to Help Lawyers Work 'Better, Smarter'
- 3Paul Weiss, Trailblazer for U.S. Firms in China, to Close Beijing Office
- 4Formal Charges Filed Against Judge Accused of Helping Defendant Escape ICE Detention
- 5Top 10 Predicted Business and Human Rights Issues for 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250