Herbert Smith Freehills Hikes Pay for New York Associates
The U.K. firm said its associates in New York will join the $190,000 crowd, but additional bonuses—and raises in London—aren't certain for now.
June 22, 2018 at 01:26 PM
3 minute read
London-based Herbert Smith Freehills on Friday became the latest law firm swept up in the tidal wave of associate raises washing over the industry.
The firm said Friday it would boost its salaries for its New York associates, though the increases will not include the additional bonuses that some others have offered in New York and elsewhere.
“We have created an elite offering in New York, and we portray ourselves to clients and the marketplace as elite,” said Scott Balber, Herbert Smith Freehills New York office managing partner and the U.S. head of investigations and financial services litigation.
“As a result, we should be compensating our elite associates in a market standard way.”
Herbert Smith's new associate base salaries will be effective as of July 1 and follow the market standard set by Cravath, Swaine & Moore earlier this month.
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy kicked off the current mania for salary increases on June 4, pushing base salaries for first-year associates to $190,000 along with increases for subsequent classes. Cravath upped the ante soon afterward, increasing the scale for midlevel and senior associates by $5,000 and $10,000, respectively.
The scale looks like this, for anyone who hasn't kept score:
- Class of 2017 — $190,000
- Class of 2016 — $200,000
- Class of 2015 — $220,000
- Class of 2014 — $255,000
- Class of 2013 — $280,000
- Class of 2012 — $305,000
- Class of 2011 — $325,000
- Class of 2010 — $340,000
Unlike other law firms that also will dole out midyear bonuses akin to those first instituted by Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, Herbert Smith will not change its existing bonus structure for associates.
Nearly 40 Am Law 100 firms have raised salaries so far this month. Magic Circle firms Clifford Chance and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer also announced that they would be matching the Milbank-Cravath scale for their U.S. associates late last week.
Balber said Herbert Smith wasn't increasing pay in New York in response to its U.K. rivals, but to keep pace with top firms operating in New York.
“We compete in the New York market with all the best firms, and that's why we need to be compensating people appropriately,” Balber said.
As for its associates in U.K., Balber said that the firm's London team re-evaluates associate compensation separately and independently.
“I know they're having those discussions now and all the time,” he added.
Following announcements that they would increase salaries for their U.S. associates, Kirkland & Ellis and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan also increased their associate pay for their U.K. associates.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNFL Deputy GC Exits, Adding to Intrigue Over League's GC Search
New York-Based Clifford Chance Partner Missing in Mike Lynch Yacht Disaster
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250