Regulator Issues Warnings to Insurers on HIV Prep Medications, Short-Term Health Plans
The NY Department of Financial Services has issued a circular letter warning insurers against discriminating against New Yorkers who use HIV prevention medications. It also issued a letter reminding health insurers that selling short-term, limited duration policies remains illegal in the state, despite a proposed federal rule by the Trump administration.
June 22, 2018 at 04:26 PM
3 minute read
The department also issued a letter warning health insurers that certain short-term health insurance plans envisioned by the Trump administration in a proposed federal rule are illegal in New York state. Following a probe of reports that some insurers may have been denying applications for policies to individuals who were taking PrEP prophylaxis medication to help prevent infection with the virus that causes AIDS, Superintendent Maria Vullo on Friday issued a letter to all insurers underwriting life, disability and long-term care policies in New York warning that “the department concludes that adverse underwriting decisions based solely on an applicant's use of PrEP are inconsistent with the Insurance Law” prohibiting unfair discrimination. “Issuers may underwrite for increased health risk if based on sound actuarial principles or if related to actual or reasonably anticipated experience. However, practices that rely solely on the use of PrEP to identify and underwrite a higher risk of HIV infection are contrary to the Insurance Law,” the letter stated.
The Life Insurance Council of New York Inc., an industry group, said Friday, "New York's life insurance companies provide millions of people with the financial protection they need to protect their families. Our industry is highly regulated by the state and our companies work very hard to comply with all state laws and regulations. New York has a robust life insurance market that provides consumers, including those living with HIV, with life insurance products. Each company makes its own individual underwriting decisions and that allows consumers to find policies that meet their needs," in an emailed statement to the New York Law Journal.
On Thursday, the department also released a circular letter reminding health insurers in the state that “short-term, limited duration health insurance plans are prohibited in New York state regardless of potential regulatory changes.”
The DFS issued the notice in response to a proposed rule published by the federal Departments of Health and Human Services, Treasury and Labor earlier this year that would allow expanded offerings of short-term, limited-duration health plans for terms of up to 364 days, relaxing restrictions in federal law enacted by the Obama administration. Vullo, in a statement, called the plans an “end run around the Affordable Care Act,” that would “entice people to buy junk insurance.” Vullo reminded insurers operating in the state that such plans would remain illegal in New York, and that under state law they must continue to follow guaranteed renewal requirements, except for nonpayment of premiums by a policyholder or withdrawal of the insurer from the state's marketplace.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
The American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
7 minute readGE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
2 minute readJudge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250