Equifax Agrees to New Data Breach Safeguards in Consent Order With State Regulators
The actions are part of a consent order announced Wednesday between Equifax and banking regulators from New York and seven other states.
June 27, 2018 at 04:01 PM
4 minute read
Equifax Inc.'s headquarters in Atlanta. Photo Credit: John Disney/ ALM Following last year's massive data breach , credit reporting company Equifax Inc. has agreed to take a set of corrective actions negotiated by the state Department of Financial Services. The actions are part of a consent order announced Wednesday between Equifax and banking regulators from New York and seven other states. The agreement comes in the wake of a breach that compromised the data of 143 million people in the United States including eight million New Yorkers. The company has agreed to enact stronger oversight and risk protection to improve digital security and protect consumers, DFS Superintendent Maria Vullo said. “DFS continues to take aggressive action in holding Equifax Inc. accountable for the massive data breach that exposed the sensitive and private information of millions of Americans,” Vullo said in a statement. “The consent order announced today between Equifax and the commissioners of eight state banking departments demonstrates the necessity of continued state oversight of financial services companies, through measures such as examinations and actions such as DFS's recently finalized credit reporting agency registration regulation.” Equifax has agreed to take six major actions to avoid another breach like last year. The company's board members will have to review and approve a written risk assessment plan for future digital threats. The plan will have to address the vulnerabilities of personally identifiable information, the likelihood that another threat will happen, how to prevent that threat, the potential damage it could cause the company, and what the company will do if that happens. Equifax will also have to improve oversight of its information security program. That will include a written information security policy that will be followed by an annual report on how the program is performing. The company's board will also have to produce detailed minutes concerning management of its information security. The board is also tasked with reviewing digital security policies and keeping them up to date and applicable to current threats. Those policies will have to include the roles and relationships of people involved in any response to threats, including the company's information technology operations. An audit committee of the Equifax board will also be tasked with evaluating information technology controls at the company. Similar rules apply to vendors with the company. Equifax will have to improve oversight and documentation of any vendors to safeguard consumer information. State banking regulators in Alabama, California, Georgia, Maine, Massachusetts, North Carolina and Texas joined New York on the consent order with Equifax Wednesday. The consent order follows an announcement Monday from the DFS that credit reporting agencies will now be required to register with the state agency and follow its strict cybersecurity regulations. Until now, those rules only applied to banks, insurance companies and other financial institutions. That rule includes many of the same requirements that were included in Wednesday's consent order, include a mandate that credit reporting agencies develop their own comprehensive cybersecurity protocol to protect against future threats. Equifax has three months from Wednesday's announcement to implement all of the actions laid out in the consent order from the DFS and other regulators.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
7 minute readNot All Secrets Are Trade Secrets: SDNY Examines the Limits of NDA Protection
13 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Meta Seeks Declaratory Judgment in VR Eyewear Tech Patent Infringement Case
- 2Corporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
- 3Goodwin, Polsinelli, Fox Rothschild Find New Phila. Offices
- 4Helping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
- 5How GC-of-Year Sam Khichi Has Helped CVS Barrel Through Challenges
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250