NY Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Regulations: An Update
The new DFS rules apply to all entities under its jurisdiction, including insurance companies, insurance agents, banks, charitable foundations, consumer lenders, mortgage brokers, holding companies and premium finance agencies.
June 28, 2018 at 02:30 PM
9 minute read
Regulation No. | Regulation | Effective Date |
500.2 | Cybersecurity Program to be maintained | March 1, 2017 |
500.3 | Written Cybersecurity Policy Approved by Senior Officer or board; may be affiliate program | March 1, 2017 |
500.4 | Chief Information Security Officer Must Be Appointed; Can be Affiliate or Outside Contractor | March 1, 2018 |
500.5 | Penetration testing or Continuous Monitoring | March 1, 2018 |
500.6 | Audit Trail: maintain financial and other information for two to five years | September 1, 2018 |
500.7 | Limit and Review Access Privileges | March 1, 2017 |
500.8 | Application Security: Written Procedures for In-house Applications | September 1, 2018 |
500.9 | Periodic Risk Assessments in accordance with written policies | March 1, 2018 |
500.10 | Use, Hiring and training of Qualified Cyber Security Personnel | March 1, 2017 |
500.11 | Third Party Providers: Written Policy and Procedure | March 1, 2019 |
500.12 | Multifactor Authentication for accessing data from an external network | March 1, 2018 |
500.13 | Limitations on Data Retention: can't maintain unnecessary data | September 1, 2018 |
500.14 | Training and Monitoring authorized users | 9/1/18 (section a)3/1/18 (section b) |
500.15 | Encryption of Non-Public Information | September 1, 2018 |
500.16 | Written Incident Response Plan | March 1, 2017 |
500.17 | Notice to Superintendent of Cybersecurity Events | March 1, 2017 |
500.18 | Maintain Confidentiality of Non-Public Information | March 1, 2017 |
- Maintain a cybersecurity program; This may be adopted from an affiliate, and should detect and prevent cybersecurity risks, and use defensive infrastructure.
- Prepare a written cybersecurity policy approved by a senior officer or the board. This policy should meet 14 factors outlined in the regulations. The factors include information security, data governance and classification, asset inventory and device management, access controls, business continuity and disaster recovery planning. They also include systems operations; systems and network security; systems and network monitoring; systems and application development and quality assurance; physical security and environmental controls; customer data privacy; vendor and third party service provider management; risk assessment and incident response.
- Designate a Chief Information Security Officer, who should maintain cybersecurity policies and procedures and issue an annual written report to the board of directors about the firm's cybersecurity program and any lapses. The CISO may be an independent contractor or work for an affiliate.
- Engage in penetration testing by continuous monitoring or by annual testing, as well as biannual vulnerability assessments.
- Maintain an audit trail designed to reconstruct material financial transactions and designed to detect and respond to cybersecurity events.
- Limit and periodically review access privileges.
- Engage in periodic risk assessments designed to anticipate potential cybersecurity threats.
- Use and train qualified cybersecurity personnel.
- Institute written guidelines for maintaining the security of internal and external applications used by the company.
- Prepare a written policy and procedure for third-party providers' data security, including risk assessment; minimum cybersecurity practices; periodic assessment of cyber-risk provided by third party providers; guidelines for due diligence; third parties' use of encryption and related issues.
- Prepare written limitations on data retention.
- Multi-factor authentication for any person accessing the company's internal networks from an external network.
- Encryption of nonpublic information, to the extent feasible.
- Training and monitoring of company personnel regarding cybersecurity.
- Preparation of a written incident response plan, including internal roles, goals, remediation, etc.
- Include notice to the superintendent in the event of a data breach.
- Maintain the confidentiality of non-public information.
Conclusion
The New York DFS cybersecurity regulations are being implemented on a staggered schedule, with additional compliance dates scheduled for September 2018 and March 1, 2019. The requirements of the DFS regulations should be noted not only by registrants, but also by vendors who do business with them. Registrants should act diligently to ensure their compliance with DFS cybersecurity requirements. Cybertechnology experts are expecting enforcement action from the DFS, and no company wants to be the first case.This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readCome Fly With Me: DOJ’s Proposed FARA Amendments and the Tourism Industry
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SDNY Criminal Division Deputy Chief Returns to Debevoise
- 2Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
- 3Tragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
- 4Weil, Loading Up on More Regulatory Talent, Adds SEC Asset Management Co-Chief
- 5Big Banks Did Great Last Year. What Does That Mean for Big Law?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250