NYC Legal Aid Society Says City Should Provide More Funding for Pay Raises
As the five District Attorney's Offices in New York City are set to give their entry-level prosecutors a pay bump with the help of millions in increased spending by the city government, the Legal Aid Society, which is contracted by the city for its services, says it's time to boost public defenders' paychecks.
June 29, 2018 at 04:49 PM
4 minute read
Credit: Rrraum/Shutterstock.com
As the five District Attorney's Offices in New York City are set to give their entry-level prosecutors a pay bump with the help of millions in increased spending by the city government, the Legal Aid Society, which is contracted by the city for its services, says it's time to boost public defenders' paychecks. City lawmakers signed off on a $15.3 million spending increase to the DA's Offices in the coming fiscal year, of which about $5.5 million was earmarked for pay increases for entry-level prosecutors. The DAs have for the past several budget cycles raised concerns that the salaries for newly minted attorneys have fallen behind those offered at city agencies like the Corporation Counsel's Office, where salaries start at $68,494. At the DA's Offices, salaries range from $60,000 to about $64,000, and spokespersons from the offices said it has yet to be determined how much more their first-year prosecutors will receive from the infusion of additional city funding. As for Legal Aid, which receives funding from the city through different contracts, recent graduates working for the legal service provider straight out of law school and who are awaiting their bar exam results are paid $53,582; upon passage of the bar, their pay jumps to $62,730. For new lawyers saddled with law school debt who are living and working in one of the most expensive cities in the country, the pay is not enough to keep them from leaving public service law, said Tina Luongo, attorney-in-charge for the criminal defense practice at Legal Aid. Legal Aid receives a $108 million appropriation from the city for indigent legal defense, and Luongo said the appropriation has remained flat for the last six fiscal years. Luongo said she submitted a request for $3 million to address the pay parity issue in the coming fiscal year, but said that the extra money wasn't included in the final version of the budget. Luongo noted that New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio's office did sign off on $20 million more to Legal Aid and other legal service providers in the city to handle an influx of homicide cases that are being shifted away from 18-b panels to institutional providers at the start of next year, but she said that appropriation will be needed to take on the increased workload. As it stands now, Luongo said, some of her staff are having to take on food service and tutoring jobs to make ends meet—a situation that she said is not ideal for attracting and retaining talent. “It's going to force people to either not do public interest work or do it and leave,” she said. According to a city budget document, city appropriations to Legal Aid for trial-level defense has averaged about $89 million for the last several fiscal years, while its annual caseload has fallen from more than 224,200 in its 2014-15 fiscal year to about 142,400 in the 2017-17 fiscal year. "The Legal Aid Society is a critical partner to the City in providing affordable and fair legal representation for our most vulnerable communities," said de Blasio administration spokesman Raul Contreras in an email. "We will continue providing support for the vital work they perform for New Yorkers.” City Councilman Rory Lancman, who chairs the council's Justice System Committee, said in a written statement that he plans to hold a hearing on fair pay for practitioners across the criminal justice system this fall. “Our justice system depends on talented and experienced public defenders to advocate on behalf of indigent New Yorkers,” Lancman said. “We are grateful for the extraordinary work public defenders do every day, and as such, it is critical that they are compensated fairly, and in line with what the city pays its own employees.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
3 minute readCravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
NY District Attorneys Ask for Level Funding Amid Statewide Drop in Violent Crime
Trending Stories
- 1'We Should Be Pragmatic': Meet the Possible Next FTC Chair
- 2Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
- 3Jury That Convicted Ex-Sen. Robert Menendez Accidentally Saw Improper Evidence, Prosecutors Say
- 4Freshfields Hires DOJ Official, Squire Taps Paul Hastings Atty for US Antitrust Head
- 5Goodbye 'Yellow Freight' Road?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250