Harvey Weinstein Faces Maximum Penalty of Life Sentence From New Charges
The Manhattan District Attorney's Office announced on Monday that Weinstein, 66, was charged with a first-degree criminal sexual act and two counts of predatory sexual assault pertaining to conduct from 2006; the latter charges carry a maximum penalty of life in prison.
July 02, 2018 at 12:52 PM
4 minute read
Harvey Weinstein. Photo Credit: AP Photo/John Carucci A third accuser has come forward with allegations that she was the victim of sexual misconduct at the hands of movie mogul Harvey Weinstein. The Manhattan District Attorney's Office announced on Monday that Weinstein, 66, was charged with a first-degree criminal sexual act and two counts of predatory sexual assault pertaining to conduct from 2006; the latter charges carry a minimum 10-year sentence and a maximum penalty of life in prison. The superseding indictment adds to the first- and third-degree rape charges and the first-degree criminal sexual act charges he received in May. The rape charges relate to an alleged victim from 2013 who, like the third victim, remains unnamed. The criminal sexual act charge pertains to an accuser named Lucia Evans, a former aspiring actress who has said Weinstein forced her to give him oral sex in 2004, and who went public with her story. “This indictment is the result of the extraordinary courage exhibited by the survivors who have come forward,” said Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr. in a news release. Assistant Manhattan District Attorneys Joan Illuzzi and Kevin Wilson are leading the prosecution, Weinstein pleaded not guilty to the charges in his first indictment, and intends to plead not guilty to the new charges, said Weinstein's lawyer, Benjamin Brafman of Brafman & Associates. “Mr. Weinstein maintains that all of these allegations are false and he expects to be fully vindicated,” Brafman said in an email. “Furthermore to charge Mr. Weinstein as a predator when the interactions were each consensual is simply not justified.” Weinstein's arraignment on the new charges is scheduled for July 9. The new criminal charges add to an already-long list of legal problems for the disgraced producer, who is also a defendant in at least a dozen lawsuits regarding his alleged sexual misconduct filed in courts in Los Angeles, London and Canada. His production company dropped him just days after The New Yorker and The New York Times published articles about Weinstein's alleged sexual misconduct with scores of actresses and employees—allegations that failed to materialize into criminal charges and, in some cases, were resolved by settlements. In March, New York magazine published an article detailing the investigation in accusations by Italian model Ambra Gutierrez that Weinstein groped her during a meeting at his office. Following the incident, Weinstein sent Gutierrez away with tickets to a Broadway show and she went to the police. New York City detectives had Gutierrez wear a wire to the show, and could allegedly hear Weinstein admitting to the attack. He allegedly admitted to it again in a subsequent meeting between Weinstein and Gutierrez at the Tribeca Grand Hotel, as well as trying to force her into a hotel room. But Vance declined to pursue charges against Weinstein, citing insufficient evidence; legal observers say prosecutors likely would have pursued him on counts of misdemeanor sexual abuse. Police sources told New York magazine that they thought there was a strong case against Weinstein and that Vance's ADAs were apparently trying to scuttle the investigation. Following publication, Gov. Andrew Cuomo issued a rare executive order directing the New York Attorney General's Office to investigate how Vance's staff handled the Gutierrez matter. A spokeswoman for the Attorney General's Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday as to whether the investigation is still underway, but following the issuance of Cuomo's order, the office said it would conduct a limited review of Vance's handling of the case until his investigation is complete. Jeanne Christensen, a partner at Wigdor who represents plaintiffs in a proposed class action against Uber Technologies Inc. claiming that the ridesharing service failed to protect women from sexual assault and who is not involved with the Weinstein case, said Weinstein's highly publicized arrest in May was a “big moment” for women—it showed that public institutions are taking allegations of sexual assault seriously, she said, and may hearten other accusers to come forward. “I would have to think that this might not be the last one that we hear about,” Christensen said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250