Former NY AG Schneiderman Files Retirement Papers, Comptroller Confirms
Eric Schneiderman will collect a gross monthly pension of $5,329, or $63,948 annually, from the state. He received his first payment at the end of June.
July 05, 2018 at 04:50 PM
4 minute read
Former New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is set to receive a gross annual pension of $63,948 after filing for retirement last month. Schneiderman filed for retirement June 5, the state comptroller's office confirmed Thursday. Schneiderman will collect a gross monthly pension of $5,329, or $63,948 annually, from the state. He received his first payment at the end of June. Schneiderman was an employee of the state for about two decades before his abrupt resignation in May amid domestic violence allegations. He was first elected to the State Senate in 1998, where he served until his election as attorney general in 2010. Schneiderman replaced Andrew Cuomo, who was elected governor. His fall from grace was quick. He announced his departure from office just three hours after an article from The New Yorker detailed the accounts of four women that said Schneiderman was physically violent and emotionally abusive toward them. Nassau County District Attorney Madeline Singas was appointed by Cuomo as a special prosecutor to investigate those claims in May. Cuomo also directed Singas to look at the Attorney General's Office itself to see if there was “any facilitation by the office or any cooperation by the office as a secondary, but related matter,” he said. Her office has not announced charges as of Thursday. Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance had originally opened an investigation into Schneiderman days after his resignation, but was accused of having a conflict of interest in the matter. Schneiderman's office was investigating Vance for his decision not to prosecute former film mogul Harvey Weinstein on sexual assault charges in 2015 . If Schneiderman is prosecuted and convicted on sexual assault or harassment charges outside of his role as attorney general, he will still collect his pension in full. The state's laws on pension forfeiture only strip an elected official's pension if they are convicted of a crime related to their office. The law is also not retrospective. It only applies to crimes committed after January 2018. The claims in The New Yorker article were alleged to have happened before then. Schneiderman in May retained Isabelle Kirshner from Clayman & Rosenberg, a firm that has often represented lawyers in criminal cases. Schneiderman has mostly been out of the public spotlight since his resignation, but the office he vacated has not. The events set off a flurry of interest in the position of state attorney general, starting with who would be Schneiderman's immediate replacement. The Legislature chose former Solicitor General Barbara Underwood to serve the rest of Schneiderman's term. She had already been serving as his acting replacement while lawmakers mulled the decision. Underwood is not running to be elected to the office in November. That field is already crowded. New York City Public Advocate Letitia James has the backing of the state Democratic Party. She's competing against Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney from the Hudson Valley, Fordham Law professor Zephyr Teachout, and former Cuomo aide Leecia Eve in the Democratic primary. That contest is set for Sept. 13. Keith Wofford, an attorney from New York City, is the state Republican Party's candidate for the spot. There were rumors that others would get in the race, but those were quickly dismissed. Rep. Kathleen Rice, who ran for the seat in 2010, was interested but ultimately declined to run. She said state law would prohibit her from seeking two offices at once. Maloney disagrees with that claim. Some suggested former federal prosecutor Preet Bharara would run as an independent. Bharara has not said he will not run for the seat, but he told the New York Times last year that he had no plans to seek any office. “I don't think I would enjoy politics in any shape or form,” Bharara said. “The way I say it respectfully—as an Indian-American and given the tea-drinking habits of my parents—it's not my cup of tea.” Election day is Nov. 6.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250