New DAASNY President Urges Cuomo to Reject Bill to Create Misconduct Board
The New York Law Journal sat down with him to talk about his career and his vision for prosecutors in New York state.
July 05, 2018 at 08:50 PM
6 minute read
Albany County District Attorney David Soares, who was sworn in this week as president of the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, compared an effort by state lawmakers to empower a board to investigate prosecutorial conduct to attempts by national Republicans to discredit Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Soares, a Democrat, replaced Oneida County District Attorney Scott McNamara as president of DAASNY this week. McNamara had reached the end of his term. Soares is a graduate of Albany Law School, where he said he originally wanted to go into corporate law. That changed when he interned at Albany City Court, he said. “I recognized just how the criminal justice system was having an impact on people that looked an awful lot like me,” Soares said “From that one experience as an intern, it changed my direction forever.” Soares went on to intern at the Albany County District Attorney's Office, where he then worked after law school. He was first elected DA in 2004. Soares has begun his one-year term as president. The New York Law Journal sat down with him to talk about his career and his vision for prosecutors in New York state. Is there a case that you've worked on as Albany County District Attorney that stands out? The case that impacts me even today is the one involving the death of a young child named Kathina Thomas . I had never witnessed a community sort of galvanizing around one tragic event like that. I remember walking in the neighborhoods and having defendants, gang members walk up to me in public looking to provide information and speaking to me, a member of law enforcement, about that tragic event. What does it mean right now to be a prosecutor in New York state? I'm so proud of the work that prosecutors are doing all throughout New York state because the very first time I walked into the DAASNY winter conference meeting, I was attacked by another prosecutor and made to feel as if I didn't belong. Why? [Former Westchester County District Attorney] Jeanine Pirro, that's all you have to say. I had run on reforming Rockefeller drug laws and Pirro viewed that as a threat, not only to her, but to all prosecutors and so she delivered the rallying cry in the room in opposition to me. I look back at that experience and I look at where the association is now and it's a radical departure from its previous posture. So many of the best practices that are in existence right now are coming from prosecutors. Prosecutors have taken the lead in alternatives to incarceration and reform. I feel very excited about the direction that the association is going. What will the priorities of DAASNY be over the next year? The priority of the organization is to be more proactive and less reactive. We don't know what the agenda for the state is going to be until the governor really sets [it] toward the end of the year. By waiting until there's an announcement, we always appear to be reactive and I've challenged myself, as well as the association, to begin developing our own agenda and speaking to our leadership about what we see as experts on the frontlines every day. What do you think is the No. 1 issue facing prosecutors in New York right now? The No. 1 threat to public safety and public health is the opioid crisis. It's the analogs, it's the internet, the amount of product that you're able to acquire as a result of the dark web. That is the No. 1 issue for prosecutors. Another issue is witness intimidation and overcoming the fear of people from the most marginalized in crime-scarred communities with cooperating with law enforcement. The Legislature passed a bill creating a commission to investigate the conduct of prosecutors. Will that change the work of DAs going forward? That is, perhaps, the most misguided piece of legislation that we have ever seen proposed by the Legislature, and it didn't fall on deaf ears or blind eyes that they were proposing this as their former leader was being prosecuted in downstate New York. We believe that the legislation is unconstitutional, but I want to make it perfectly clear that we don't fear oversight. What we fear is interference and that we could be investigating or prosecuting someone and a member of a PAC could file a complaint and we could have members of this body summoning a prosecutor to respond to allegations in the middle of an investigation. It's not unlike what we're seeing right now within the GOP-led House and Special Prosecutor Mueller. That bill will now be sent to the governor. Have you talked to anyone in his office about rejecting that bill? We're certainly going to maintain an open line of communication with the governor's office, and we would urge the governor to veto that piece of flawed legislation. The state could likely legalize recreational marijuana. Is that good or bad for prosecutors, or does it not really matter? I believe that New York state will be engaged in a market regulation for marijuana. DAASNY has not yet discussed the issue, but I as Albany County District Attorney am helping to educate my community about what that means. I think it's just a matter of time before we see that happen in the state of New York and then it will take prosecutors all over the state to help address the concerns of people. Have you ever thought about running for another office? I think those of us who answer this call do it because we enjoy having an immediate and direct impact in the kind of service that we provide to the public. The area we want to explore and that we've set a course for in this term in this office is sealing—helping people who have paid their price who are now looking to improve their lives, helping them seal records of their previous convictions and helping them get on a proper footing to improve our lives. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLuigi Mangione Indicted on Charges Including First-Degree Murder in Shooting of Health Insurance CEO
In 'Kousisis,' the DOJ Once Again Pushes the Limits of Federal Fraud Prosecutions
10 minute readBen Brafman's Professional Legacy After 50 Years? Himself
Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Federal Sex Crimes Charges
Trending Stories
- 1Aging Condo Neglect Leads to $1M Payout in Miami Beach Slip and Fall
- 2‘BiT Global Lost’: Federal Judge Won’t Stop Coinbase From Delisting wBTC Token
- 3Some Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
- 4Judge Asks: Should Tom Girardi Serve Sentence in a Medical Facility or Behind Bars?
- 5EPA grants California authority to ban sales of new gas cars by 2035. Action faces reversal by Trump
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250