Court of Appeals Agrees to Consider New Trial in Murder Case
Court of Appeals Judge Rowan Wilson granted prosecutors leave to appeal a decision from the Appellate Division, Second Department that threw out John Giuca's conviction in February.
July 06, 2018 at 04:52 PM
2 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock.com The state's highest court has agreed to take arguments over whether a new trial will be given to John Giuca, a Brooklyn man convicted of murdering a New Jersey college student more than a decade ago. Court of Appeals Judge Rowan Wilson granted prosecutors leave to appeal a decision from the Appellate Division, Second Department that threw out Giuca's conviction in February. The court usually takes about 11 months between granting leave and hearing oral arguments on a case. Giuca's attorneys have argued prosecutors from the Brooklyn District Attorney's Office withheld evidence about John Avitto, a man who testified during Giuca's trial in 2005. Avitto said at trial that Giuca admitted he was involved in the student's death while both of them were housed on Rikers Island. Giuca said that never happened. Mark Bederow, a criminal defense attorney with his own practice in Manhattan, is representing Giuca on the appeal. He said prosecutors withheld several facts about Avitto during trial, including that he did not come forward with testimony about Giuca until he left a court-mandated drug treatment program without permission. “It is disappointing this will result in Giuca languishing at Rikers for another year, however I have every expectation that the court will affirm the Appellate Division's unanimous opinion and emphasize for all state courts that prosecutors must disclose evidence that might reasonably lead a jury to conclude that a witness is biased in favor of the prosecution,” Bederow said Friday. A spokesman for the Brooklyn District Attorney's Office said prosecutors are looking forward to presenting their case to the state's highest court. “We are pleased that the Court of Appeals agreed to hear this case and we look forward to presenting our arguments in court,” the spokesman said. Giuca was convicted in 2005 and sentenced to serve 25 years to life for the murder of New Jersey college student Mark Fisher.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDaniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
'Judicial Maturation': Judge Vacates Life Sentences That He Imposed on Brooklyn Man in 1997
5 minute readA Motion to Dismiss, a Reduced Sentence Request, and a Motion to Remand
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cannabis Took a Hit on Red Wednesday, but Hope Is On the Way
- 2Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
- 3People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 4How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
- 5Bar Report - Dec. 23
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250