Lawyers for Central Park Five Say First Release of Discovery Materials Conveys Bias
But the city's Law Department defended the piecemeal release of the materials, saying that it's in the interest of the public to start releasing what's ready to go rather than waiting for final completion of the review process.
June 03, 2019 at 02:54 PM
5 minute read
Editor's Note: With the release of Netflix's miniseries “When They See Us,” there is renewed interest in the criminal prosecution in the assault of the Central Park jogger. So, we're sharing this story that we posted in July of 2018.
Attorneys for the wrongly convicted men known as the Central Park Five said the first portion of a massive trove of documents and other materials from their criminal and civil cases, released late on Thursday evening via a New York City government website, paint an unfavorably biased portrait of their exonerated clients.
But the city's Law Department defended the piecemeal release of the materials, saying that a “substantial” amount of the materials are ready for disclosure, and that it's in the interest of the public to start releasing what's ready to go rather than waiting for final completion of the review process.
“The city determined that it was not in the public interest to delay the posting of all the documents until the very last document has been reviewed,” said Law Department spokesman Nicholas Paolucci, who said another tranche of documents would be released in the coming weeks.
Since 2015, city attorneys have been working with attorneys from Beldock Levine & Hoffman, which represents four of the five defendants who were convicted and later cleared of the 1989 beating and rape of Patricia Meili, to pore over the roughly 200,000 documents and depositions from 95 parties generated from their case to prepare them for release to the public.
The first batch of materials to be released is from the original investigation and prosecution of Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Raymond Santana Jr., Kharey Wise and Yusef Salaam, who were all teenagers at the time of the attack.
On April 19, 1989, Meili was one of 10 victims who were attacked by what was described as a marauding band of some 30 youths in Central Park.
In 2002, Matias Reyes, who was serving time for murder and sexual assault, came forward and admitted that he had been the one who attack Meili and that he acted alone, which was backed up by matching him with DNA evidence found at the crime scene.
Following an investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, in 2003, all five men had their convictions tossed out. They then filed suit against the city, alleging that they were wrongfully convicted.
After 11 years of litigation, in 2014, the city reached a $41 million settlement with the Central Park Five. The New York Times filed a motion to intervene in the case for the purpose of compelling disclosure of discovery materials, but the motion was denied in 2015 after the city agreed to unseal requested materials.
Included in the first batch of materials are audio files of 911 calls from the night of the attacks in Central Park as well as video of interviews with four of the five defendants and others who were in the park that night.
But Beldock Levine partner Karen Dippold said attorneys for the exonerated had insisted throughout the review process on releasing all materials from the case at once, and that just releasing the materials from the original investigation provides a “biased concept of what transpired.”
“We think it's not giving an evenhanded presentation of the facts in the case,” Dippold said. She said that future releases of materials, which include the files from re-investigations by the Manhattan DA and the New York City Police Department, will provide a fairer picture of her clients.
Aside from the news of the document release, the 29-year-old case has attracted attention more recently because of statements by President Donald Trump, who famously took out full-page newspaper ads calling for the executions of the Central Park Five, refusing to back away from his position in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.
Linda Fairstein, who headed up the Manhattan DA's sex crimes unit in 1989 and who worked on the investigation in the Meili case, said she thinks the material released on Thursday and those coming in subsequent releases will help “change the narrative back to the truth.”
Fairstein pointed to not only the interviews with the defendants themselves, but from others who were in Central Park on the night in question who say they saw the defendants assault two other victims.
“If anyone is reluctant, there will be more and more information that will confirm the original verdict and reveal even more facts that weren't available at trial,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOrrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Ephemeral Messaging Going Into 2025:The Messages May Vanish But Not The Preservation Obligations
5 minute readSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Coerced Confessions and the Burden of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt
- 2Attorneys ‘On the Move’: O’Melveny Hires Former NBA Vice President; MoFo Adds Venture Capital Partner
- 3'Skin in the Game': Lawyers Call for Pressure After American Airlines Crash
- 4Apple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
- 5A Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250