Bronx Judge Stripped of Staff, Chambers After Refusing New Assignment
Bronx Supreme Court Justice Armando Montano had presided over felony criminal cases and pretrial hearings and was reassigned to the Integrated Domestic Violence court, which operates under a “one judge, one family” policy.
July 23, 2018 at 05:26 PM
3 minute read
Photo Credit: Fotolia A Bronx judge who was reportedly unhappy with being transferred to a domestic violence part and refused to show up for work has been stripped of his staff and chambers, but will continue to collect a paycheck. Bronx Supreme Court Justice Armando Montano had presided over felony criminal cases and pretrial hearings and was reassigned to the Integrated Domestic Violence court, which operates under a “one judge, one family” policy that is intended to bring together criminal, civil and matrimonial involving one family in which an underlying issue is domestic violence under the jurisdiction of a single jurist. But, in an article published on Monday morning, the New York Post reported that Montano refused to show for his new assignment. In a letter to Justice Robert Torres, the administrative judge for criminal matters in Bronx Supreme Court, Montano said he could “not comprehend” why he was being assigned to handle family and civil matters, considering his “proven” record of presiding over felony cases, the Post reported. On July 18, Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks of the Office of Court Administration issued an order diverting Montano's caseload, as well as any new cases that would have been headed his way, and relinquishing him of his judicial resources, which also included a parking space. "It's an important, complex criminal part,” said court system spokesman Lucian Chalfen of the domestic violence court. “For whatever reason, he refused the assignment.” But while OCA has the power to transfer judges to other courts, take away office space and control the assignment of cases, it can't fire elected judges. The authority to suspend judges or remove them from the bench lies with the Commission on Judicial Conduct. Meantime, Montano will continue to collect a $208,000 salary. Chalfen declined to comment on whether OCA has referred the matter to the commission. Montano was first elected to the bench, as a Civil Court judge, in 2013. From there he was named an acting state Supreme Court justice and was elected to the state Supreme Court last year. The Post reported that Montano is being represented by Paul Gentile, who previously served as an acting Bronx district attorney and that Montano would take legal action if he is not given 30 days to find a resolution to the situation, according to the Post. Gentile did not respond to requests from the Law Journal for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 2When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
- 3New York Top Court Says Clickwrap Assent Binds Plaintiff's Personal-Injury Claim to Arbitration in Uber Case
- 4'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
- 5About the Awards: Southeastern Legal Awards Q&A with Regional Managing Editor Michael Marciano
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250