The Tax Act and Real Estate—The Limitation on Deductibility of Interest
Real Estate Securities columnist Peter M. Fass continues his discussion of changes affecting real estate including the he limitation on the deductibility of interest and its application to real estate.
July 31, 2018 at 11:16 AM
2 minute read
Summary of the Limitation
- business interest income, and
- 30 percent of adjusted taxable income (ATI). For taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, and before Jan. 1, 2022, ATI is taxable income other than items not allocable to a trade or business, business interest income and deductions, depreciation, amortization, and depletion, the 20 percent pass-through deduction for business income, and net operating losses (NOLs). For taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2021, depreciation, amortization, and depletion is excluded from the calculation.
- For taxpayers with relatively low leverage, the exclusion of depreciation in determining ATI through 2021 might produce a situation where interest deductions would not be limited until 2022, such that the more beneficial depreciation and expensing provisions could justify a delay in the election.
- Any disallowed interest may be carried forward indefinitely.
- Partnerships are evaluated on a separate entity basis, with excess ATI allowed to flow up to partners in certain circumstances.
Exclusion From the Interest Limitation
New permanent Alternative Depreciation System (ADS)
- Residential real estate: 27.5 years regular period and new 30 year ADS period
- Nonresidential real estate: 39 years regular period and 40 year ADS period
- Qualified improvement property: new 15 year (straight line) regular period and 20 year ADS period
- The new depreciable periods apply to taxable years beginning after 2017. It is not clear how the amendments apply to existing property.
Application for Partnerships
Example of Application to a Partnership
Peter M. Fass is a partner at Proskauer Rose.This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York State Authorizes Stand-Alone Business Interruption Insurance Policies
6 minute readRejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250