Medicaid Patients Sue State NY Health Department to Secure Dental Coverage
The state Department of Health defended the Medicaid program in a statement on Friday, saying the program is constantly being evaluated for ways it can be improved.
August 03, 2018 at 03:11 PM
6 minute read
Two Medicaid beneficiaries have filed a lawsuit against the state Department of Health for denying coverage of replacement dentures and dental implants. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, claimed the state's reasons for denying that coverage violate federal law concerning the Medicaid program. The plaintiffs are being represented by Mary Eaton, a partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher in Manhattan, and attorneys at the Legal Aid Society, including Belkys Garcia from the Law Reform Unit, Rebecca Novick from the Health Law Unit, and others. The Department of Health, as a state agency, is represented by the state Attorney General's Office. “What is important about this case is that New York state is denying medically necessary dental care to low-income New Yorkers and some of New York's most vulnerable populations and it's having an impact on people's health and well-being and in some cases threatening their life,” Garcia said. “That practice is what we're hoping to change.” The state Department of Health defended the Medicaid program in a statement on Friday, saying the program is constantly being evaluated for ways it can be improved. Spokesman Gary Holmes said the agency is committed to evaluating each case individually to determine if coverage is warranted. “New York state Medicaid offers some of the most comprehensive dental services in the country and is constantly evaluating its programs and making appropriate changes as they are needed,” Holmes said. “The Department of Health is committed to reviewing any pre-existing policies and unique individual cases to determine if dental procedures or changes to coverage are warranted. We will continue to work with affected individuals to ensure the state is being responsive to their needs.” Plaintiffs Frank Ciaramella and Richard Palazzolo are Medicaid recipients who live in New York City and Suffolk County respectively. According to the complaint, both Ciaramella and Palazzolo were both approved for dentures by the state Medicaid program. Both men either lost their dentures or weren't able to use them because of events out of their control, according to the complaint. Ciaramella's bottom dentures were so ill-fitting that he once choked on them, and his upper dentures were run over by a car after they fell out of his mouth. Palazzolo, who had partial lower dentures, came home one day to his room in a supportive housing facility to find his dentures had been stolen. An oral surgeon told Ciaramella that he would need dental implants before he was given new dentures because he needed more bone support for the replacements, the lawsuit said. He was denied coverage of the implants because the service was not billable after placement of dentures, according to the complaint. Both men were denied new dentures because a rule from New York's Medicaid program requires eight years to pass before a new set is covered, the plaintiffs said. Attorneys claim in the complaint that the state's denial of coverage violated provisions of the federal Medicaid Act, including the comparability provision. That part of the law essentially said coverage for a service under Medicaid can not be denied for some individuals but allowed for others. They argued that since other Medicaid recipients in New York are approved for dental implants, Ciaramella should be as well. Attorneys also claimed the state's Medicaid rules violate the availability provision of the Medicaid Act, which in part mandates that if a state chooses to cover dental services, that should include the treatment of “disease, injury or impairment that may affect the oral or general health of the beneficiary,” according to the complaint. Both men, the lawsuit said, need new dentures to maintain their overall health. Ciaramella suffers from end-stage renal disease, diabetes, and was diagnosed as protein malnourished. Attorneys argued the state is making his condition worse by not providing coverage for dentures that would allow him to eat food with more protein. His renal condition prevents him from drinking protein shakes, they said. Palazzolo also suffers from diabetes and has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder and depression, the complaint said. He's had a hard time chewing since he lost his dentures, which has limited his diet, and also said his physical appearance without dentures has worsened his mental health. Attorneys argued the overall health of both plaintiffs has been threatened without dentures, and that the state should be mandated to cover replacements to improve their well-being. “The New York Medicaid program's arbitrary restrictions on access to dental implants and replacement dentures plainly violate the Medicaid Act's requirement to provide necessary care,” Eaton said. “But they also disregard the numerous side effects of those rules on thousands of low-income New Yorkers relying on Medicaid for their dental care—including medical complications, social isolation and employability.” Similar arguments were used in Cruz v. Zucker , a case brought against the state Department of Health over Medicaid coverage for the treatment of gender dysphoria. Willkie Farr and the Legal Aid Society also worked on that case. They argued in Cruz that the state was violating federal law by denying Medicaid coverage for transgender-related health services because those treatments were medically necessary. The state eventually promulgated and expanded rules allowing Medicaid coverage for gender dysphoria. “In that case the Department of Health was providing all of these services for people who had a different diagnosis other than gender dysphoria,” Garcia said. “Specifically here the Medicaid program is offering dental implants to some people but not to everybody.” The plaintiffs also claimed the state is violating the Americans with Disabilities Act by denying coverage to Ciaramella and Palazzolo, who both live with disabilities. Attorneys are seeking a class action lawsuit in the case. U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken of the Southern District of New York is presiding over the case, according to filings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York Times Moves for $100K in Attorney Fees Against Dfinity Foundation
3 minute readFederal Judge Slaps Down the SEC’s Attempt to Regulate Crypto Liquidity Providers
10 minute readA Client Is Guilty; But Another Man Is Wrongfully Convicted
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250