Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on Securities Investors
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) did not make any major changes for the taxation of gains and losses from securities transactions.
August 20, 2018 at 01:46 PM
6 minute read
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) did not make any major changes for the taxation of gains and losses from securities transactions. Favorable tax rates continue to apply to capital gains, and losses continue to be used as offsets to capital gains and a limited amount of ordinary income. But there are numerous changes made by the TCJA that affect the taxation of securities investors, some directly and some indirectly. Here is a roundup of these changes.
|Tax Rates on Capital Gains
The TCJA did not change the rates on long-term capital gains and qualified dividends. The rates remain at zero, 15 percent or 20 percent, depending on the individual's taxable income (which does not align with tax brackets). The zero rate applies for taxable income below a set amount; the 20 percent rate applies for taxable income over a threshold amount. For 2018, the breakpoints are:
- Married filing jointly and surviving spouses: Zero rate for taxable income not exceeding $77,200; 20 percent for taxable income over $479,000.
- Heads of households: Zero rate for taxable income not exceeding $51,700; 20 percent for taxable income over $452,400.
- Singles: Zero rate for taxable income not exceeding $38,600; 20 percent for taxable income over $425,800.
- Married filing separately: Zero rate for taxable income not exceeding $38,600; 20 percent for taxable income over $248,500.
For example, in 2018 a married couple could have income plus long-term capital gains (assuming no capital losses) of up to $101,200 ($77,200 taxable income limit for zero tax rate plus $24,000 standard deduction) before the capital gains would be taxed.
Kiddie tax. For children subject to the kiddie tax, the taxable income breakpoints for trusts and estates governs whether they pay zero, 15 percent, or 20 percent on their long-term capital gains (Code Sec. 1(j)(4)). More specifically, the zero rate applies only if taxable income in 2018 is not more than $2,600; the 20-percent rate applies once taxable income exceeds $12,700.
Higher capital gains rates. The higher rates of 25 percent for certain depreciated property (technically unrecaptured Section 1250 gain) and 28 percent for collectibles continues to apply post-TCJA. The new ordinary income tax rates set by the TCJA apply to net short-term capital gains. These rates are 10, 12, 22, 24, 32, 35, and 37 percent.
Deferral option eliminated. Until now, if an investor had a capital gain on the sale of publicly-traded securities, gain could be deferred by investing the proceeds within 60 days in common stock or a partnership interest in a specialized small business investment company (SSBIC) (Code Sec. 1044). The TCJA repealed this deferral opportunity for sales after 2017.
Carried interest rule: For fund managers that have capital gains passed through to them from their partnerships according to a profits interest in exchange for management services, a new carried interest rule applies. They must meet a three-year holding period to qualify for capital gain treatment (Code Sec. 1061(a)). If this holding period is not met, then capital gains are treated as short-term capital gain taxed as ordinary income. The IRS announced that S corporations are subject to the extended three-year holding period applicable to partnerships (Notice 2018-18, IRB 2018-12, 443).
|Tax Treatment of Capital Losses
Capital losses can be used to offset capital gains for the year. If there are excess losses, they can offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income, such as salary or interest income ($1,500 if married filing separately). Any unused capital losses can be carried forward indefinitely to offset capital gains (and the limited amount of ordinary income) in subsequent years. This dollar amount has been in place since 1978; it was not changed by the TCJA.
|NII tax
Higher-income investors may have to pay an additional Medicare tax of 3.8 percent, referred to as the net investment income (NII) tax. More specifically, this tax applies to the lesser of net investment income, or the amount that modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) exceeds a statutory amount:
- Married filing jointly and surviving spouse: $250,000
- Single or head of household: $200,000
- Married filing separately: $125,000
For securities investors with MAGI over the applicable statutory amount that are subject to the NII tax, it means that the capital gains rate effectively becomes 18.3 percent (15 + 3.8 percent) or 23.8 percent (20 + 3.8 percent), depending on their taxable income. The TCJA did not make any changes to the NII tax. The statutory amounts are not adjusted annually for inflation.
|Investment-Related Expenses
Commissions to buy and sell securities are not separately deductible. Commissions to buy securities become part of basis; those to sell securities effectively reduce proceeds (the sales price). However, other investment-related expenses, such as advisory fees (e.g., a 1 percent managed account fee), safe deposit box rentals to store securities, and subscriptions to investment letters, magazines, and online services, are not deductible in 2018 through 2025. The reason: The TCJA suspended the deduction for miscellaneous itemized expenses subject to the 2 percent of adjusted gross income floor (Code Sec. 67(g)).
Investment interest remains deductible for those who itemize deductions. Investment interest, such as interest on loans to buy securities, is deductible to the extent of investment income (which usually does not include capital gains). The TCJA did not directly change this itemized deduction. However, due to the increase in the standard deduction amount, fewer individuals likely will itemize, and without itemizing there is no write off for investment interest.
|Qualified business income deduction
The new 20 percent deduction for owners of pass-through entities is impacted by their capital gains (Code Sec. 199A). More specifically, the deduction cannot be more than an owner's taxable income reduced by net capital gains for the year. Additional IRS guidance is needed to flesh out the scope of this limitation and what it means for owners who are also securities investors.
|Looking Ahead
There are a number of proposals before Congress that could change the taxation of capital gains (for 2018 or future years, depending upon effective date):
- Aligning the zero rate, 15-percent rate, and 20-percent rate for capital gains with tax brackets as was done in the past rather than with different taxable income amounts.
- Indexing for capital assets (e.g., Capital Gains Inflation Relief Act of 2018; S. 2688)
Whether these or any other changes will be enacted remains to be seen. And further IRS guidance on the TCJA changes may impact the taxation of securities investors.
Sidney Kess, CPA-attorney, is of counsel at Kostelanetz & Fink and senior consultant to Citrin Cooperman & Co.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Trade Fixtures in New York Eminent Domain Cases—What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
10 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250