President Donald TrumpProtesters Alleging Assault by Trump Security Team Can Proceed With Lawsuit
The judge refused to dismiss the protesters' claims that Trump, the Trump Organization and Trump's presidential campaign were vicariously liable for the actions of longtime Trump bodyguard Keith Schiller and other guards.
August 21, 2018 at 01:03 PM
3 minute read
President Donald Trump can't shake a lawsuit filed by a group of protesters who allege they were roughed up in 2015 by the then-candidate's security detail in front of Trump Tower during a campaign speech.
Bronx Supreme Court Justice Fernando Tapia refused to dismiss the protesters' claims that Trump, the Trump Organization and Trump's presidential campaign were vicariously liable for the actions of longtime Trump bodyguard Keith Schiller and other guards named as defendants in the case, finding that Trump “authorized and condoned” the guards' type of conduct.
Efrain Galicia and four other Mexican activists, who are plaintiffs in the case, say they took to the streets outside Trump Tower in September 2015 in response to Trump's statements during a June 16, 2015, campaign announcement that Mexico is sending “rapists” and people bringing drugs and crime into the United States.
During their demonstration, protesters carried signs with slogans such as “Trump: Make America Racist Again,” and a few donned Ku Klux Klan outfits, according to the protesters' suit.
Galicia claims that Schiller approached the group and grabbed his sign, causing a scuffle to ensue, though both men are at odds as to who initiated the physical contact.
“Maybe he should have been roughed up because it was absolutely disgusting what he was doing,” Trump told reporters at a campaign rally after the incident, according to a footnote in Tapia's ruling.
Tapia also denied summary judgment for the plaintiffs' assault and battery claims but dismissed negligent hiring claims against Trump and the Trump Organization.
The protesters are represented by solo attorney Roger Bernstein and Benjamin Dictor of Eisner & Dictor. In an email, Dictor said his clients are seeking punitive damages against the defendants.
“Our clients were violently assaulted by then-candidate Trump's security team,” Dictor said. “We look forward to trying the case against now-President Trump, Keith Schiller, and the other defendants in the Bronx.”
Trump Organization attorney Matthew Maron and Lawrence Rosen of Larocca Hornik Rosen Greenberg & Blaha are representing the defendants. A spokesperson for the organization said that Tapia erred by not dismissing the entire complaint and that it intends to appeal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Attorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute read
NY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
