2nd Circuit Reaffirms CBA Law, Nods to Sister Circuits in Upholding NLRB Order
The National Labor Relations Board found in 2017 that the health care company HealthBridge Management violated its CBA when it essentially used the end of a subcontractor agreement to gut the benefits of workers forced to reapply for their jobs.
August 23, 2018 at 03:28 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reaffirmed its position on firms' collective bargaining agreement obligations to employees, while accepting arguments from sister circuits on similar issues, in upholding a National Labor Relations Board finding against health care company HealthBridge Management.
The panel of Circuit Judges Dennis Jacobs and Christopher Droney, with U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill for the District of Connecticut sitting by designation, declined to review the 2017 NLRB decision against HealthBridge, finding the board's reasoning legally sound. The board sided with workers with the New England Health Care Employees Union who filed unfair labor practice charges in 2012.
In 2009, a subcontractor for HealthBridge took over management and payroll responsibilities over a few dozen housekeeping workers at three of the company's health centers. Based on the contract with HealthBridge, the union was assured its workers would retain benefits, seniority and job status. However, once the subcontractor's contract ran out, the workers it had supervised were told they were out of jobs and would have to reapply. Almost all were rehired, but at lower wages, with fewer benefits and without accrued seniority.
When the workers protested the new arrangement, a HealthBridge administrator threatened to call the police for those who refused to sign on or leave. According to the court, 45 of the 48 offered to be rehired were, almost all of whom did so within 48 hours.
The circuit panel, in upholding the board's remedial order against HealthBridge, affirmed its finding that an employer may not use a short-term operational change to get around its contract agreements with a union. Circuit law, the panel noted, supported this conclusion against a “disguised continuance” of operations meant to undercut a CBA. Circuit law specifically prevents employers from disregarding contracted seniority status, even if employees are shifted onto the payroll of another entity.
The panel pointed to other circuits' ruling in the same area, which supported the workers' claims. Specifically, the panel pointed to the Tenth Circuit's decision in 2000's NLRB v. F&A Food Sales, which shared a number of the features of the HealthBridge case. This and other decisions that support, like the Second Circuit does, barring employers from using short-term operation changes to subvert CBAs supplement the circuit's own findings, the panel noted.
“The obligations that HealthBridge attempted to shed remained binding, and no reasonable reading of those obligations permitted HealthBridge to eliminate the seniority-based entitlements of its housekeeping workers as it did,” the panel wrote.
A spokesman for the National Labor Relations Board declined to comment on the panel's decision.
Fisher & Phillips co-regional managing partner Brian Gershengorn led HealthBridge's legal team on appeal. He did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
The American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
7 minute readGE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
2 minute readJudge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250