Cuomo Signs Bill Affording Attorney-Client Privilege to Lawyer Referral Services
The legislation adds a provision to the state judiciary law requiring that any communication between an individual and an agent or member of a lawyer referral service be kept confidential.
August 27, 2018 at 12:13 PM
2 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo approved a bill on Aug. 24 that provides attorney-client privilege for communications between consumers and lawyer referral services.
The bill, sponsored by state Sen. John Bonacic, R-Orange, and Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz, D-Bronx, was introduced last year to provide confidentiality protections for individuals seeking an attorney. Dinowitz and Bonacic chair the Judiciary Committees in their respective chambers.
The legislation adds a provision to the state judiciary law requiring that any communication between an individual and an agent or member of a lawyer referral service be kept confidential. The legislation takes effect immediately.
According to the bill's sponsors, lawyer referral services already have immunity from civil action if they provide a referral without charge and as a public service, but the statute did not have a provision addressing confidentiality. The bill fixes that, the sponsors said in a memo with the bill.
“Information provided by a consumer when seeking legal referrals often includes information that could cause damage to a consumer's criminal or civil case if revealed to adverse parties,” the memo said.
The legislation was proposed by the New York state and New York City bar associations, both of which applauded Cuomo's approval in statements.
“Providing protection for communications between a lawyer referral service and a client has remained a key legislative priority of the New York State Bar Association,” said Michael Miller, president of the state bar association. “We applaud Governor Cuomo and the Legislature for making this important change to New York's law.”
“The city bar was pleased to collaborate with the state bar and other New York bar associations to help bring this proposal to fruition, and to facilitate passage of an ABA resolution in the hopes that other states will follow suit,” said David G. Keyko, chair of the city bar's legal referral service committee. “We applaud the Legislature and the governor for enacting this measure into law.”
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
2 minute readMayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250