Herb Rubin, Who Argued 'World-wide Volkswagen,' Isn't Ready to Retire at Age 100
You know Herb Rubin. He argued that U.S. Supreme Court case you analyzed in law school.
August 27, 2018 at 03:33 AM
6 minute read
You know Herb Rubin. He argued that U.S. Supreme Court case you analyzed in law school. World-wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 (1980), swung jurisdictional issues in defendants' favor. After that, plaintiffs could no longer justify suing in a jurisdiction that wasn't integral to the case.
That was nearly 40 years ago.
Fast-forward to 2018 and you can still meet the Herzfeld & Rubin name attorney in the flesh (There hasn't been a Herzfeld at the firm since 1960). Perhaps at a bar association meeting or the Jewish Lawyers Guild or his 100th birthday party at the Museum of Jewish Heritage.
If you attended the birthday gala—and by the family's count that included 25 Supreme Court justices—maybe you thought it was supposed to mark the end of his career. But you'd be mistaken.
“I'll work as long as I can get here,” he said during an interview at his Broad Street office overlooking the Statue of Liberty. “If I can no longer drive, I'll have to take an Uber.”
The regulars in New York City's legal community say he seems to be everywhere.
“Herb is ubiquitous,” said Mark Zauderer of Ganfer Shore Leeds & Zauderer. “At just about every legal event I attend, when I turn around, Herb is there chatting with his longtime friends and colleagues. It's inspiring to see that a lawyer's career can extend for so many decades.”
David Saxe, a former associate justice for the Appellate Division, First Department, recalls seeing Rubin argue cases well into his nineties “and he was always a well-prepared highly-credible advocate and it was amazing to watch him argue a case.”
Rubin has made some concessions to age, of course. He uses a walker and a hearing aid, leaves work every day by 4:30 p.m. to avoid the worst of the Manhattan traffic and hasn't appeared in court for the last couple of years. But, just last Thursday, he was in his office handwriting a brief. (Yes, he still does handwrite briefs!)
A full-time lawyer over the age of 100 is a rarity in New York.
The state has 1,488 registered attorneys who are over the age of 90 but only 38 over the age of 100, according to the Office of Court Administration. Only 26 of them still live in the state, and most are likely retired or semi-retired. The oldest attorney paying the fee this year was 104.
When The New York Times looked for practicing New York attorneys over the age of 90 in 2010, it found only a handful. In its article, “Senior Counsel, Very Senior Counsel,” Rubin, who was 91 at the time, told the Times, “Certainly, there are things that I should be remembering that I wish I could remember a lot faster. But in terms of being able to analyze a case and to figure out the theory under which we should proceed and recall precedents which will be helpful, certainly, I can do that.”
And, he says, that's still true today.
Rubin graduated from NYU Law School more than 75 years ago. After law school, he joined a firm with 85 lawyers, which was considered big in the 1940s. He was there only a short while because he was drafted and became a military lawyer in the Signal Corps, part of the U.S. Army. He was stationed for a time at Fort Monmouth in New Jersey.
While in law school, he met and married Rose Luttan, who would later become a state Supreme Court justice. The couple had three children and so many grandchildren, great-grandchildren and great-great-grandchildren that Rubin now has trouble keeping track. Rose died in 2016 after 75 years of marriage.
Rubin's eyes twinkle and his whole face lights up when he speaks about his grandson, Tommy, who followed in his footsteps and is now a deputy counsel at a high-tech firm. When Tommy was at Harvard Law, he somehow let it slip that his grandfather argued World-wide Volkswagen in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. The case was in their textbooks, and the professor was impressed.
Recalling the case, Rubin said, “The argument we had to make was an uphill argument. Our theory was the courts weren't there for forum-shopping.”
The case involved an automobile purchased in New York that was involved in an accident in Oklahoma. Volkswagen argued Oklahoma's jurisdiction over the manufacturer and retailer would violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision in Volkswagen's favor began to reverse the idea that plaintiffs could bring suit in any jurisdiction, no matter how tenuous the connection.
“The way in which the cases in personal jurisdiction seemed to be heading before Volkswagen was a more loosey-goosey approach to jurisdiction that would take into account all kinds of factors,” said Saxe, who's now a partner at Morrison Cohen. “But this case absolutely returned the analysis that minimum context be established first before you got into any other factors. So it was really a return to yesteryear.”
In the ensuing years, Rubin has argued cases in the Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Eighth and Ninth Circuits. He has met Eleanor Roosevelt and Rudy Giuliani. More recently, in Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 U.S. 746 (2014), his firm submitted an amicus brief on behalf of foreign automobile manufacturers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250