Image: ShutterstockWhen It Comes to Associate Satisfaction, New York Is Merely Middle of the Pack
Results from The American Lawyer's 2018 Midlevel Associates Survey show that midlevel associates in Manhattan aren't as happy as those in Dallas or Los Angeles, but they're much more satisfied than their colleagues in other major markets.
August 28, 2018 at 03:49 PM
3 minute read
When it comes to Big Law, the Big Apple is typically ahead of the market. But when it comes to midlevel associate happiness, Manhattan is right, smack in the middle.
The average score for 59 law firms surveyed in New York City on The American Lawyer's 2018 Midlevel Associates Survey was 4.257.
While New York's score, which was down slightly from last year's average score of 4.238, was marginally below averages in Dallas (4.443), Houston (4.422) and Los Angeles (4.446), the city's midlevel associates rated their firms higher than in other major markets like Chicago (4.252), San Francisco (4.237), Washington, D.C., (4.207) and Atlanta (4.157).
The midlevel survey is based on responses from 5,270 third-, fourth- and fifth-year associates at 102 firms from the Am Law 100, Am Law Second Hundred and Global 100.
Associates scored their law firms in a number of different categories, such as job satisfaction, compensation and benefits, guidance and training, relations with partners and other associates, the potential to make partner, a firm's policy on billable hours and management's openness about firm strategy.
Schulte Roth & Zabel took the top spot in New York, as well as The American Lawyer's overall midlevel associate satisfaction rankings. The firm, which just two years prior had placed 78th on the list, attributed its success to a complete revamp of its associate program to include a more elaborate mentorship network, generous parental leave policies and business development training, among other initiatives.
Paul Hastings came in a close second in New York with an average score of 4.854, up from 4.708 the year prior. O'Melveny & Myers, which took the top spot in New York last year, slipped to No. 3, while Blank Rome and Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft jumped several spots to round out the top five for firms in the city.
At the other end of the spectrum, global legal giant Dentons held the bottom spot among large firms in New York. With an average score of 3.713, midlevel associates cited some dissatisfaction with the firm's openness and communication regarding partnership.
Haynes and Boone, which came in last for midlevel associate faction in the city in 2017, and Hogan Lovells rounded out the bottom three at Nos. 57 and 58, respectively.
“We take the results of the Midlevel Associate Survey seriously and, in our firm's spirit of continuous improvement, will factor them into our planning moving forward,” a Haynes and Boone spokesman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Trade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
10 minute read
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
