Harlem Club Owner Alleges NYPD Arrested Him for 'Working While Black'
Dr. Clyde Pemberton claims NYPD officers ended up arresting him and colleagues after they were assaulted by two white women who Pemberton says were seen dragging an unconscious woman through his club.
August 30, 2018 at 02:35 PM
4 minute read
An owner of a Harlem nightclub alleges being arrested for “working while black” in a new federal civil rights suit against the New York City Police department claiming false arrest and malicious prosecution, among other causes of action.
Dr. Clyde Pemberton, the 69-year-old chairman and CEO of the parent company that owns the MIST nightclub in Harlem, claimed officers called to assist an unconscious club-goer in June 2017 ended up arresting him and two other club workers. The episode, Pemberton's attorneys at Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady claim, represents another instance of an all-too-common instance in today's social climate: a black individual whose very presence invites the unwanted and unwarranted interest of law enforcement, despite having done nothing wrong.
According to Pemberton's complaint, while participating in a business meeting at the club, he witnessed an unconscious woman being dragged through the club by two other women. All three were white, according to the complaint.
When Pemberton, a medical doctor, approached them over concern about the safety of the unconscious woman, suggesting she be placed in a chair. He and other staff that intervened were assaulted physically and verbally by the other women, including being subjected to racial slurs and told to “go back to the Congo.”
Paramedics and police arrived after club staff was directed to call 911. The complaint alleged that police observed the two women yelling offensive language and acting belligerent. According to Pemberton, when he spoke to the supervising officer on the scene to tell him he was the club owner and a medical doctor, he was told, “You are no doctor or any s–t like that here tonight.”
The supervising officer then directed officers to arrest Pemberton and two others associated with the club, the complaint stated. No NYPD officer spoke to Pemberton or the others before arresting them, taking them to the precinct and charging them. On their way to the precinct, the three were told they were “just being taken down to the precinct for questioning” and they had nothing to worry about “because [they] didn't do anything wrong,” the complaint alleged.
The complaint noted that one of the women was arrested for assault. The unconscious woman was removed from the club by an ambulance. Pemberton claimed in the complaint that if his and his associates' arrests were based on information provided by the arrested woman, “such information would have been unreliable, and any reasonable police officer would have known that it was unreliable and required further investigation before acting upon it under the circumstances.”
All three of the men from the club were charged with misdemeanor unlawful imprisonment and didn't leave the precinct until early in the morning after the incident. Pemberton claimed in the complaint that at no time were any of the women forced to remain in the club; they were, in fact, shown were the exit was.
While the charges were ultimately dropped by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.'s office in November 2017, Pemberton claimed in the complaint that he not only suffered financially due to the negative impact of the arrest on his business and the $15,000 he had to pay in legal costs, but that the incident he and the two other men arrested experienced “fundamentally changed the way they see the police and the extent to which they feel comfortable in their own neighborhoods—and, indeed, in their own skin.”
For Pemberton's attorney, partner Elizabeth Saylor, the circumstances highlight the continued problems the NYPD has dealing with discrimination within its ranks.
“Unfortunately, the NYPD does not effectively discipline or hold officers accountable who wrongly arrest people, wrongly assault people, and discriminate against people,” she told the New York Law Journal. “The NYPD does not have a practice of doing that.”
Saylor was joined by Emery Celli associate Doug Lieb on the action.
A spokesman for the NYPD declined to comment on the suit, referring questions to the New York City Law Department.
“We'll review the complaint and respond accordingly,” a Law Department spokeswoman said in an emailed statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250