Let’s assume that the § 1983 plaintiff claims that she was arrested by the defendant police officer in retaliation for her exercise of free speech rights. The evidence shows that the arrest was supported by probable cause. Probable cause is a complete defense to a § 1983 Fourth Amendment false arrest claim. But is it also a complete defense to a § 1983 First Amendment retaliatory arrest claim?

In Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, 138 S. Ct. 1945 (2018), the U.S. Supreme Court recently held, 8-1, that probable cause did not automatically defeat a §1983 First Amendment retaliatory arrest claim asserted against the city based upon its alleged enforcement of a policy of retaliation. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the opinion for the court. Justice Clarence Thomas was the sole dissenter.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]