SEC Reaches Financial Settlements With Ex-Dewey & LeBoeuf Leaders
If the settlements are approved by a court, securities regulators will have wrung about $216,815 from leaders from the busted firm. That money, however, is still a small fraction of a fraud alleged by the SEC.
September 04, 2018 at 04:54 PM
4 minute read
Steven Davis, a former chairman of Dewey & LeBoeuf, has agreed to pay a $130,000 civil penalty in a settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, according to newly filed court papers, the largest fine so far to come out of the SEC's case against five leaders of the now-defunct firm.
The SEC filed court papers Aug. 31 laying out the details of Davis' settlement, as well as the settlements with ex-finance director Francis Canellas, who has agreed to pay $43,178 in disgorgement and interest; and former Dewey controller Thomas Mullikin, who has agreed to pay $8,635.78 in disgorgement and interest costs.
If the settlements are approved by the court, the SEC will have wrung out of Dewey leaders about $216,815, including its settlement with former Dewey executive director Stephen DiCarmine. That deal, including a $35,000 civil penalty, was revealed earlier this year.
Still, the civil penalties and disgorgements are a small fraction of the fraud that the SEC initially alleged was at issue in the case. At the same time that criminal charges were announced in 2014, the SEC alleged in a civil complaint that five Dewey executives and finance professionals facilitated a $150 million fraudulent bond offering by the law firm, which collapsed in 2012. The SEC alleged that Dewey leaders devised ways to artificially inflate income and distort financial performance, while claiming that the firm's private bond offering “seized on phony financial figures.”
Since the criminal charges were filed, however, only one former Dewey leader, former CFO Joel Sanders, was convicted by a jury. Sanders, who was disbarred as a result of that conviction, managed to avoid prison time and is currently pursuing an appeal. DiCarmine was acquitted at retrial, while Canellas and Mullikin reached plea and cooperation agreements with Manhattan prosecutors.
For his part, Davis in 2016 signed a deferred prosecution agreement. The deal requires him not to practice law in New York for five years and he was suspended from practicing before the SEC.
The SEC's settlements with Davis, Canellas and Mullikin still need court approval from Southern District Judge Valerie Caproni. In a letter sent Aug. 31 to Caproni, SEC attorney William Finkel said the settlements “would fully resolve the litigation” against Davis, Canellas and Mullikin and leave outstanding only the SEC's case against Sanders.
Sanders has reached a partial settlement with the SEC, contingent upon his pending criminal appeal in state court. Under that partial settlement, he is prohibited from serving as an officer or director of a public company and the possibility of a future fine against him is left open.
While the SEC case is winding down against the former Dewey executives, they still face a suit in an Iowa federal court by an insurance company that participated in the firm's 2010 bond offering. Aviva Life and Annuity Co. sued Davis, DiCarmine and Sanders in one case and Canellas in a separate suit for distributing false and misleading information regarding Dewey's financial condition. Both suits, as well as the SEC action, were put on hold during the criminal trials.
In court papers filed in July, the parties told the federal court in Iowa that they are “discussing a potential resolution” and proposed to update the court in mid-September.
Canellas' lawyer, Brian Maas, a partner at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, declined to comment on the SEC settlement, as did Mullikin's attorney, Kenneth Kaplan, who runs his own criminal defense firm.
Elkan Abramowitz, Davis' lawyer and a name partner at Morvillo Abramowitz Grand Iason & Anello, said his client is paying a civil penalty, rather than disgorgement, because “it was demonstrated” at the first criminal trial that Davis made less money after the private placement than before.
Abramowitz said Davis continues to live in London, where he is consulting for law firms about “aspects of legal practice.” He declined to specify other details about Davis' work. The former Dewey leader had previously served as a legal adviser to the United Arab Emirate of Ras al Khaimah.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 2Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 3Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
- 4'Big Law Had Become Too Woke': Why Bill Barr Moved On
- 5Manhattan U.S. Attorney Damian Williams Announces Resignation from Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250