NYC Criminal Justice Reforms Effective in Diverting Offenders, Report Finds
Criminal justice reforms recently enacted by the New York City government with the intent to take a lighter touch on low-level offenses have led to a dramatic reduction in the number of offenses being handled in criminal courts, according to a new report.
September 05, 2018 at 02:36 PM
3 minute read
Criminal justice reforms recently enacted by the New York City government with the intent to take a lighter touch on low-level offenses have led to a dramatic reduction in the number of offenses being handled in criminal courts, according to a new report.
In the six months following the June 2017 implementation of a package of bills known as the Criminal Justice Reform Act, the report states, there was a roughly 90 percent decrease in the number of criminal summonses issued citywide for a group of low-level offenses that include public drinking, public urination, littering, excessive noise and violations of rules for city parks.
The report was compiled by the Misdemeanor Justice Project at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
The decline in criminal summonses issued—down to 3,661 in the second half of last year, compared with more than 58,400 for the same period in 2016—means that criminal courts are issuing fewer warrants for the low-level offenses, the report states, as well as seeing fewer cases filed.
Instead, police have been issuing more civil summonses for low-level offenses, which diverts more matters into the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings and can provide for greater flexibility for offenders in terms of payment options for their tickets and for appearing for hearings.
“So far it is achieving its goal of reducing the number of people who are receiving a permanent criminal record for a low-level, non-violent offense,” said Preeti Chauhan, director of John Jay's Misdemeanor Justice Project, in a news release, referring to the city's enactment of criminal justice reform laws.
But the researchers also found some disparities in enforcement patterns: after implementation of the reforms, males were more likely than females to receive criminal summonses, as well as individuals aged 35 to 65 years in relation to other age groups.
Criminal summonses were also more likely to be issued in the Bronx and on Staten Island when compared with the other three boroughs.
Additionally, according to figures from the New York City Police Department that were not included in the report, civil summonses are disproportionately issued to black and Latino individuals—in the second quarter of this year, police issued 10,089 civil summonses, or 66 percent of the total for that timeframe, to black and Latino people.
But the drop in criminal summonses comes at a time when stop-and-frisk stops by police have tapered off and overall crime in the city is down, said Elizabeth Glazer, director of the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice, in an interview.
“That is a very encouraging sign that it is possible to encourage law-abiding behavior without resorting to summonses, arrests and other kinds of enforcement,” Glazer said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
2 minute readMayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
1 minute readMayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250