Rochester Judge Recommended for Removal Faces New Gun Charge
The indictment alleged that Astacio, who is prohibited from owning a gun, tried to buy a 12-gauge shotgun from Dick's Sporting Goods in the town of Henrietta in April.
September 11, 2018 at 06:12 PM
4 minute read
Rochester, New York, City Court Judge Leticia Astacio, who could be stripped of her judgeship next month by the Court of Appeals in the wake of a DWI conviction in 2016, is now being charged in a separate incident for allegedly attempting to illegally purchase a gun in April, a special prosecutor has said.
Seneca County District Attorney Barry Porsch, who was appointed to look into the matter, announced late Tuesday that a grand jury has filed a one-count indictment charging Astacio with attempted criminal purchase or disposal of a weapon, a class D felony.
The indictment alleged that Astacio, who is prohibited from owning a gun, tried to buy a 12-gauge shotgun from Dick's Sporting Goods in the town of Henrietta in April, according to the press release. Astacio is reportedly prohibited from possessing a gun as a condition of her probation.
Astacio is represented by Mark Foti, a criminal defense attorney in Rochester. He noted Tuesday afternoon that during a grand jury proceeding, there is no opportunity to challenge a prosecutor's case before the jury decides whether to file charges.
“We are disappointed that the grand jury in Leticia Astacio's case was led to an indictment that we believe is inconsistent with the law,” Foti said. “We look forward to the opportunity to bring evidentiary and constitutional challenges against these charges in court, and we are ready to litigate.”
It's the latest twist in a long-running legal saga for Astacio, which began in 2016 when she was arrested and convicted for driving while intoxicated. She has maintained that she was not drunk at the time of the arrest.
The state Commission on Judicial Conduct, a state panel that disciplines the state's judges, recommended that she be removed from the bench earlier this year for the conviction and certain behavior she exhibited while on the bench. In one occasion, she failed to recuse herself in a case where the defendant was a former client, for example.
She also violated her conditional discharge after her conviction when she drank alcohol at least once. The commission knew she drank because she was required to blow into an ignition interlock device before she drove her car. The device detected alcohol twice. Astacio said after the first time that she was unaware she could not drink as a condition of her discharge. She has not said whether the second “bad blow” was from her or someone else.
She also failed to show up to a court appearance after the second “bad blow” because she was on an international vacation. She has claimed that her attorney at the time called her to tell her about the hearing after she told him she should be contacted only by email while on the trip.
She asked the Court of Appeals to review the commission's decision to remove her earlier this year. The high court heard arguments on her removal last week.
Robert Julian, a personal injury attorney from Central New York, represented Astacio in arguments. He could not immediately be reached for comment on the new charge
The maximum sentence for the charge would be seven years in prison, though the judge would have discretion to sentence Astacio without any time behind bars if she's convicted.
READ MORE:
Arguments on Rochester Judge's Removal at NY Court of Appeals Focus on Alcoholism, Public Confidence
Court of Appeals to Consider Decision to Remove Rochester Judge From Office
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourts Beginning to Set Standards for Evidence Relying Upon Artificial Intelligence
4 minute readNY Judge Admonished Over Contributions to Progressive Political Causes
Attorneys ‘On the ‘Move: Morrison Cohen Expands White Collar Practice; O’Melveny Brings Back Corporate Finance Partner
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1On the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
- 2State Budget Proposal Includes More Money for Courts—for Now
- 3$5 Million Settlement Reached With Stone Academy
- 4$15K Family Vacation Turned 'Colossal Nightmare': Lawsuit Filed Against Vail Ski Resorts
- 5Prepare Your Entries! The California Legal Awards Have a New, February Deadline
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250