Judiciary Panel Set to Kick Off Hearings on Parental Legal Representation
The hearings will be the first opportunity for the Commission on Parental Legal Representation to hear from stakeholders on how to improve the state court system to ensure legal representation in family court.
September 12, 2018 at 01:48 PM
4 minute read
A state judiciary panel is scheduled to hold the first of four hearings on Thursday about access to legal representation in family court matters for indigent parents in New York.
The hearings will be the first opportunity for the Commission on Parental Legal Representation, established earlier this year by Chief Judge Janet DiFiore, to hear from stakeholders on how to improve the state court system to ensure legal representation in family court.
The commission is led by former Judge Karen Peters, who retired last year after reaching the mandatory retirement age of 70. She most recently served as presiding justice of the Appellate Division, Third Department.
The panel is made up of several judges, legal service providers, local government officials, and other experts.
The first hearing is scheduled for 1 p.m. Thursday in Rochester at the Appellate Division, Fourth Department. It's expected to last three hours.
Three other hearings will be held in New York City, Albany, and Nassau County.
- The New York City hearing is set to be held at the Appellate Division, First Department from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. Sept. 27.
- The Albany hearing is set to be held at the Third Department from 9:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Oct. 10.
- The hearing on Long Island is set to be held at Nassau County Supreme Court in Mineola from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. Oct. 23.
The commission is expected to hear testimony from local government officials, institutional providers, assigned counsel programs and attorneys, their clients, and other stakeholders. The testimony will be used to prepare a report from the commission on how family law matters can be improved in New York.
“The information and suggestions for reform to be elicited from these public hearings will prove vital in moving the commission forward as it strives to build upon the groundwork being done across the state to improve the quality of mandated parental legal representation,” DiFiore said in a statement announcing the hearings.
The commission is expected to examine, in part, whether counsel assigned in family law matters are paid enough and whether the balance of funding between the state and municipalities should be adjusted to better serve indigent family members. It will also consider whether current funding levels are enough to assign appropriate caseloads to attorneys assigned as counsel.
They will also consider whether the right to counsel for indigent family members should attach earlier and how that would benefit individuals. That will also include a discussion about the criteria in determining who is eligible for assigned counsel.
There's also a unique set of issues that individuals in family court face in counties outside New York City. There is often fewer options for public transportation in rural counties, for example, which may limit the ability for some parents to make it to court. The committee is expected to look at possible solutions to those issues and others.
Any increase in funding for assigned counsel and other family court matters would have to be recommended by the judiciary to be included in next year's state budget, which state lawmakers typically resolve at the end of March.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Formal Charges Filed Against Judge Accused of Helping Defendant Escape ICE Detention
- 2Top 10 Predicted Business and Human Rights Issues for 2025
- 3$7.5M in Punitive Damages Awarded in Product Liability Case
- 4Does My Company Really Need a Generative AI Policy?
- 5'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250