State Criminal Tax Subpoenas Fell, Civil Tax Subpoenas Rose in the Last Decade
Criminal subpoenas issued by the state tax department declined in the last decade, an investigation by the New York Daily News showed, but the numbers also showed an increase in civil subpoenas. The shift may reflect a change in priorities or strategy at the department after a 2010 change in the state's tax whistleblower law, which was the first state law of its kind in the nation.
September 14, 2018 at 05:50 PM
3 minute read
The number of criminal subpoenas issued by the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance fell in the last decade, records obtained by the New York Daily News under the Freedom of Information Act show.
But the number of civil subpoenas soared in the same period, which may reflect a shift in priority or strategy by the tax department after a 2010 change in the state's tax whistleblower law, a former deputy state tax commissioner said. The Legislature amended New York's False Claims Act that year to allow private citizens to bring treble-damage false claims lawsuits against taxpayers that engaged in tax fraud or filed false returns knowingly, with some oversight by the attorney general's office.
The number of subpoenas issued by the criminal investigations division at the tax department overall fell to 858 in 2017 from 1,327 in 2008—a 35 percent decrease—after reaching a high of 1,699 in 2010, records requested under FOIA by the Daily News show. The number rose to 1,306 for one year in 2015 before dropping again.
Criminal Division investigations referred for prosecution also generally declined in the last decade with the exception of 2011, when there were 601 probes referred for prosecution—a year following the new law—and 2016 when there were 516 such probes. Last year, 259 criminal cases were referred for prosecution down from 406 in 2008.
In the same 10-year period, however, the number of subpoenas issued by the civil enforcement division soared from just one in 2010 to 1,057 in 2017. The number of civil subpoenas filed by the tax department increased most from 2013 to 2014, a jump of 56.5 percent.
A spokesman for the tax commissioner declined to comment on the data, which the office provided.
But William Comiskey, a partner at the Albany office of Hodgson Russ, a former deputy tax commissioner who left the office in 2010, said the department has begun utilizing data analytics and other statistical tools that “has impacted how they enforce things.”
“They have streamlined certain areas of enforcement and the rise of the use of subpoenas in civil enforcement makes sense,” Comiskey said. “They have far more auditors than criminal investigators,” he said of the department.
“If an audit uncovers tax liability, the matter only becomes public if the taxpayer contests the liability in the Division of Tax Appeals or if the department files a warrant,” he said, which can be an inducement to settle.
“If recovery is the goal, you recover more in the civil area than criminal. Criminal enforcement is an important part of a tax department's total enforcement efforts. It brings credibility to the whole concept of deterrence. But there is lots of room for strategic decision-making (in what kind of course you take) and stomach for the criminal area,” he said.
The largest tax settlement under the state False Claims Act to date was a $40 million settlement in state Supreme Court in New York County in April 2017 with Alabama-based Harbert Management Corp., fund sponsors for Harbinger Capital Management, and top executives, who neither admitted nor denied the allegations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250